Communication and Midterm Elections 2016
DOI: 10.1057/9781137488015_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2014 Midterm Elections on Local Television: Frames, Sources, and Valence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, national media coverage of individual candidates in down-ballot races is minimal (Baum & Groeling, 2008) because the details of the campaign are generally only pertinent to the voters in that state. Hence, most cognitive learning about midterm elections should come from local media and campaign ads (Dimitrova & Hu, 2016; Eveland, 2001; Wei & Lo, 2008), not from national partisan media outlets. Instead, ideological outlets should primarily function to emphasize partisan identities and therefore polarize evaluations of the candidates by cuing intergroup competition.…”
Section: Political Interest Media Choice and Affective Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, national media coverage of individual candidates in down-ballot races is minimal (Baum & Groeling, 2008) because the details of the campaign are generally only pertinent to the voters in that state. Hence, most cognitive learning about midterm elections should come from local media and campaign ads (Dimitrova & Hu, 2016; Eveland, 2001; Wei & Lo, 2008), not from national partisan media outlets. Instead, ideological outlets should primarily function to emphasize partisan identities and therefore polarize evaluations of the candidates by cuing intergroup competition.…”
Section: Political Interest Media Choice and Affective Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%