2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(03)00095-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2000–2001 GEP–ISFG Collaborative Exercise on mtDNA: assessing the cause of unsuccessful mtDNA PCR amplification of hair shaft samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forensic hair examiners expect that mtDNA analysis will find widespread use as a technique for forensic hair comparison [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, they believe that a morphological examination is important in forensic comparisons of evidential hairs, even today [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forensic hair examiners expect that mtDNA analysis will find widespread use as a technique for forensic hair comparison [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, they believe that a morphological examination is important in forensic comparisons of evidential hairs, even today [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis using PCR amplification and direct sequencing has been particularly useful for decomposed and trace amounts of DNA obtained from a single hair [1][2][3][4][5]. Some of the problems in the application of mtDNA analysis to hair samples have been reviewed from the point of view of forensic science [6][7][8][9]. However, it is clear that the morphological examination of hair is an important method that can be used in the forensic comparison of evidential hairs, even today [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the hair shafts (M6) was significantly more successful: 13 out of 19 labs (68%; when contrasting this frequency with the ones from Table 1, note that (Table 2), there is one lab that did not analyze M2, but shows results for M6). This clearly contrasts the low rate of success yielded by the previous edition of the GEP mtDNA exercise due to the low quantity and quality of DNA present in those hair samples (see [5]). …”
Section: Mtdna Sequence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Since 1997, the Spanish and Portuguese Working Group (GEP) of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) included mtDNA profiling as part of the GEP proficiency testing program [1][2][3][4][5]. Along the years, the number of participating labs has progressively increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Other mtDNA genes have proven useful in wildlife forensics. 43,44 Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are biologically active proteins that do not have predetermined tertiary structure while in an isolated state in solution [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] and exist as dynamic conformational ensembles. 46,48,52,[55][56][57][58] Structurally, such proteins are highly heterogeneous and range from collapsed (molten globule-like), to partially collapsed (pre-molten globule-like) and to even highly disorganized, coil-like forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%