The 100 most cited articles in dentistry

Feijoo, Javier Fernández; Limeres, Jacobo; Fernández-Varela, Marta; Ramos, Isabel; Dios, Pedro Diz

doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1017-0

Cited by 153 publications

(214 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

188

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(Cao et al 2012), ''Endodontology'' (Fardi et al 2011), ''Dentistry'' (Feijoo et al 2013), ''Respirology'' (Tam et al 2013), ''Orthodontist'' , ''Orthopedics'' (Namdari et al 2012), ''Arthroscopy'' (Cassar et al 2012), ''Vascular Surgery'' (O'Connor et al 2011), etc,. An overview of some key features and findings of these analysis are presented in Table 1.…”

Section: Citation Classicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Garfield points out two methods to do it: (i) to set a concrete number of papers (Garfield 1977) or (ii) to set a percentage of papers (top 1 % of highly cited works is a usual percentage) (Garfield 1987). Examples of specific numbers of papers used to study the classics are 100 most highly cited articles (Cao et al 2012;Fardi et al 2011;Feijoo et al 2013;Hodge et al 2012;Hui et al 2013;Li et al 2012;O'Connor et al 2011;Zhang et al 2012) or 50 most highly cited articles (Namdari et al 2012;Tam et al 2012Tam et al , 2013 or 25 most highly cited articles (Cassar et al 2012). On the other hand, some usual percentages used are top 1 % of highly cited works (Stack 2012(Stack , 2013 or top 0.1 % (Levitt and Thelwall 2009).…”

Section: Citation Classicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some authors set a specific number of publications as the ideal number of citation classics (e.g. 100, 50 or 25 are values used) (Cassar et al 2012;Feijoo et al 2013;Garfield 1977;Tam et al 2012) and others set a percentage of papers sorted by citations received (the top 1 % or top 0.1 % are used) (Garfield 1987;Levitt and Thelwall 2009;Stack 2012Stack , 2013. Again, the problem is that there is no serious scientific argument that supports those decisions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are two approaches to identify citation classics: (i) setting citation thresholds (Gehanno et al 2007;Ibrahim et al 2012;Lozano 2010, 2011;Rosenberg et al 2010) and (ii) choosing a number of papers in the top of the list of highly cited papers (Cassar et al 2012;Feijoo et al 2013;Garfield 1977;Stack 2012Stack , 2013Tam et al 2012). Former is related to the definition of citation thresholds or rates of a discipline that have to meet a paper to be considered a citation classic of that discipline.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

H-Classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citation classics identify those highly cited papers which are an important reference point in a research field. To identify a paper as a citation classic we have to fix a citation threshold value. Usually, this threshold value should not be the same for all research fields because each field presents its respective citation pattern. Studies of citation classics in the literature define particular criteria and methods to set citation thresholds, which are often set arbitrarily and designed ad-hoc, and do not allow the scientific community to validate and compare their results. In this paper we introduce the concept of H-Classics to overcome this problem and provide scientific community a standardization of key constructs. We present a new and systematic method to identify citation classics. This identification method of highly cited papers is based on the H-index and thank to the properties of H-index it is sensitive to the own characteristics of any research discipline and also its evolution. Therefore, the concept of H-Classics allows to systematize search procedure of citation classics for any field of research.

show abstract

Section: Citation Classicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Citation Classicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

H-Classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ésta forma ha alcanzado tal relevancia en la difusión del conocimiento que se ha convertido en la principal vía de transmisión de resultados de investigaciones en la mayoría de los campos del conocimiento, como la Odontología. El primer nivel de este concepto, es la búsqueda de la mejor evidencia científica para la mejor toma de decisiones (Feijoo et al, 2014). Lo importante sería tener las herramientas apropiadas para determinar cuál sería la mejor evidencia.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Revistas Odontológicas de Mayor Impacto: Una Revisión de su Comportamiento en el Journal Citation Reports

Fereira

Rosas

Alvarez

et al. 2017

Int. J. Odontostomat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A bibliometric and subject analysis of 3300 most‐cited articles in dentistry

Daryakenari

Batooli

2022

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This study aims to analyze the publications that have studied top‐cited articles in dentistry. Material and Methods The study is applied research in terms of the purpose and scientometrics descriptive in terms of type, which has been done using the Retrospective Bibliometric Analysis. To retrieve the 100 most‐cited studies in Scopus, an advance search was used. The search results indicate that 33 articles focused on analyzing the 100 most‐cited publications on oral and dental subjects. The bibliographic information, including author, journal, country, institution, citation count, and citation density was analyzed. Then the full text of the articles was reviewed to identify the most productive journal, country, and institute in publishing the 100 most‐cited articles and also article type, study design, level of evidence, and the most important subjects among the 100 most‐cited papers. Results In these 33 articles, the topics of 3300 most‐cited articles were introduced, as well as the introduction of the core journals, countries, and institutes in publishing top‐cited articles. The most common research topics in the field of dentistry cover a range of dental public health and pediatric dentistry to adhesive restorative dentistry and implantology. Dental materials, oral medicine, and pathology seem like inseparable topics of common research in dentistry. J Dent Res, which was mentioned in nine articles, was introduced as the journal with the publication of articles of highest citation. J Clin Periodontol and Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology were in the second place, being mentioned in five articles. The USA, and two institutions the University of Texas, and the University of Michigan are orderly core country and institute for the production of most‐cited articles. Conclusion Researchers and specialists can get familiar with the most productive author, journals, countries, and different institutes for publishing high‐quality articles in the field of oral and dental subjects by the means of the results of this article. Furthermore, the results of this study ranked the most cited article topics, which are of interest for publication, demonstrating the future map road oral and dental research.

show abstract

The 100 most cited articles in dentistry

Abstract: The number of citations that an article receives does not necessarily reflect the quality of the research, but the present study gives some clues to the topics and authors contributing to major advances in Dentistry.

Cited by 153 publications

References 21 publications

H-Classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index

H-Classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index

Revistas Odontológicas de Mayor Impacto: Una Revisión de su Comportamiento en el Journal Citation Reports

A bibliometric and subject analysis of 3300 most‐cited articles in dentistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About