The 100 most cited articles in the endovascular treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms

Zhou, Kevin; Maingard, Julian; Phan, Kevin; Kok, Hong Kuan; Lee, Michael J.; Brooks, Duncan Mark; Chandra, Ronil V.; Hirsh, Joshua A.; Asadi, Hamed

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.151

Cited by 15 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, the time factor would also have a definite impact as recently published articles are at a clear disadvantage because of insufficient time to accumulate a relatively greater number of citations irrespective of their content and quality . This can be partially overcome by analyzing the citation density …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

Ahmad

Abbott

Alam

et al. 2019

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims The impact of a scientific article in its respective field is reflected by its citation count. The purpose of this review was to conduct a citation analysis in order to identify and analyze the top 50 most cited articles published in Dental Traumatology since its inception in order to highlight the contribution of the journal to the field of Dental Traumatology. Methods Elsevier's Scopus was used to search and analyze the 50 most frequently cited scientific papers. After the screening process, two reviewers arranged the articles in a descending order based on their citation counts. Each article was then cross‐matched with Google Scholar. The articles were analyzed, and information including citation counts, citation density, publication year, authorship, contributing institutions and countries, article topic, study design, and keywords was extracted. Results The literature search identified 2421 articles. The citation counts of the 50 selected articles varied from 117 to 580 (Scopus) and 206 to 1130 (Google Scholar). The year in which most top 50 articles were published was 2002 (n = 5). Among 105 authors, the greatest contribution was made by JO Andreasen (n = 12). Most of the articles originated from the United States (n = 12) with the greatest contributions from the University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark (n = 6). Original research article was the most frequent study design (n = 34). The majority of the top 50 articles were focused on traumatic dental injuries. Among 131 unique key words, root resorption (n = 6) was the most frequently used. A non‐significant correlation occurred between citation count (correlation coefficient = 0.127, P = .378), citation density (correlation coefficient = 0.654, P = 2.493), and publication age. Conclusions This study identified the top 50 most cited articles published in this journal in the specialty of Dental Traumatology. The publication year of an article was not significantly associated with citation count nor citation density.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

Ahmad

Abbott

Alam

et al. 2019

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, in this study, the papers published in recent years (from 2016 to 2020) were not included in the top 100, but it does not mean those papers are not that important. Second, papers published in journals with higher impact factors may gain greater attention and thus have more citations [ 14 ]. To evaluate any inherent bias, we analyzed the correlation between the number of citations of articles in our list and the impact factors of journals where the papers were published; we also examined the correlation between the number of citations and year of publication.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hundred most cited articles in perioperative neurocognitive disorder: a bibliometric analysis

Wang

Yang

et al. 2021

BMC Anesthesiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In line with aging populations and increased application of anesthesia and surgery, perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) has received growing attention worldwide. Considerable researches into PND are being conducted; however, the quantity and quality of such researches have not been reported. Through a retrospective bibliometric analysis, this study aims to identify and characterize the top 100 cited publications on PND. Methods We searched the Web of Science database to find the top 100 cited articles focusing on PND. We collected bibliographic information, including year of publication, country of origin, article type, published journal, citation count, and authorship. To determine changes with time, we compared older and newest articles. Results The top 100 cited articles were published between 1955 and 2016; the number of citations ranged from 111 to 1248. The United States had the most published papers; clinical trial was the most common article type. The specialty journals of Anesthesiology and Anesthesia & Analgesia were the two most cited journals. Newest articles had a comparable number of citations to older articles, but the former had higher annual citation rates, greater funding disclosures, more focus on basic research, and more open access publications. Conclusions This study provides a comprehensive overview of the most cited articles and highlights the increasing attention on PND. High-quality clinical trials with a greater journal impact factor receive more citations. However, there has been a growth in the number of basic science studies as an area of research with respect to the pathogenesis of PND.

show abstract

“…With the development of minimally invasive treatment, EVAR, a new minimally invasive surgical approach for AAA, has led to global research efforts focused on evaluating the effectiveness of both treatments. The results proved that both open repair (OA) and EVAR were safe and effective in treating AAA [ 23 ], and the long-term survival rate of OA was higher than that of RVAR, as shown by long-term follow-up [ 37 ], and Zhou et al [ 13 ] performed an updated literature measurement analysis. At the same time, our results showed that analysis of risk factors for rupture in terms of blood flow and foundation (intraluminal thrombus, flow, wall stress, inflammation, expression, smooth muscle cells) is also a hot topic of current research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bibliometric analysis is an overall analysis of the published literature in a specific research area over a specific time frame [ 11 – 13 ]. Compared with traditional systematic evaluation, bibliometric analysis focuses on the institution, authorship, and social structure of the literature, providing a timely and intuitive method to explore specific areas [ 14 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Studies Related to Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Past 10 Years (2011-2020): A Bibliometric Analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms have been a topic of common global interest for the past 20 years, with a steadily increasing number of publications. The purpose of this study was to explore the research themes and the current status of the last 10 years through a bibliometric analysis of the publications in this field. Material/Methods We performed a literature search for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Web of Science Core Collection on November 14, 2021 and performed a bibliometric analysis and visualization of the results of the publications using the R-Bibliometrix package and VOSviewer software. Results From 2011 to 2020, 2381 publications were retrieved, including 2073 articles and 308 reviews. The United States had the highest number of publications and has made a large contribution to the field. Jonathan Golledge is an important researcher with the highest number of publications. Journal of Vascular Surgery is ranked first in terms of the number of publications and local citations. Mortality and outcomes, repair treatment, and risk factors are the 3 main focuses in the field, followed by intraluminal thrombus and molecular expression. Conclusions Our bibliometric analysis suggests mainstream research is focused on clinical studies related to the surgical approach and its prognosis and on pathological mechanisms and hemodynamic studies related to risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms rupture. There are many other opportunities for future research in the clinical joint basis of abdominal aortic aneurysms rupture.

show abstract

The 100 most cited articles in the endovascular treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms

Cited by 15 publications

References 19 publications

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology

Hundred most cited articles in perioperative neurocognitive disorder: a bibliometric analysis

Studies Related to Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Past 10 Years (2011-2020): A Bibliometric Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About