2008
DOI: 10.1080/01431160701469016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textural and local spatial statistics for the object‐oriented classification of urban areas using high resolution imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Texture analysis techniques have been applied to improve the classification accuracy [56] in different fields such as vegetation classification, land cover (e.g., [57][58][59][60][61][62]) and lithological mapping (e.g., [63]). The accuracy of the lithological map improves by using textures as additional layers, though the magnitude of the improvement is different from one rock type to another [63].…”
Section: Textural Indices For Lithological Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Texture analysis techniques have been applied to improve the classification accuracy [56] in different fields such as vegetation classification, land cover (e.g., [57][58][59][60][61][62]) and lithological mapping (e.g., [63]). The accuracy of the lithological map improves by using textures as additional layers, though the magnitude of the improvement is different from one rock type to another [63].…”
Section: Textural Indices For Lithological Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have indicated that pure spectral features in high spatial resolution images such as QuickBird cannot provide accurate land-cover classification using computer-based automatic classification approaches [14,15], but the incorporation of spatial information such as textural images into spectral bands or use of segmentation-based variables considerably improved the classification [15][16][17]. Also, pixel-based classification approaches such as maximum likelihood classifiers are not as good as object-based classification approaches for high spatial resolution images [15,[18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that textural features [11,12], gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) [13], local indicators of spatial association (LISA) [14] information and local spatial statistics [11] can be considered as features in OBIA classification procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%