2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetraaza macrocyclic Schiff base metal complexes bearing pendant groups: Synthesis, characterization and bioactivity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, they give stable metal complexes with many metal ions. Macrocyclic Schiff bases are used in the fields of biochemistry [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], supramolecular chemistry [ 4 , 5 ], materials science [ 6 ], molecular recognition [ 7 , 8 ], and catalysis [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they give stable metal complexes with many metal ions. Macrocyclic Schiff bases are used in the fields of biochemistry [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], supramolecular chemistry [ 4 , 5 ], materials science [ 6 ], molecular recognition [ 7 , 8 ], and catalysis [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 20 min, a 6 mm well got cut at the center of agar plates and each well were lled with prepared samples of synthesized complexes, keeping solvent media having Gentamycin as + ive control and solvent media alone as -ive control. Each plate was analyzed for measuring the zone of inhibition after 20 hr of incubation at 37 C and for fungus, zone of inhibition was measured after incubation for 48 hr at 28 C [25][26][27].…”
Section: Biological Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajakkani et al, (2021) [ 60 ] reported the synthesis and biological evaluation of stable mononuclear metal (II) complexes (specifically, Co, Ni, and Zn) with an unsymmetrical 13-membered Knoevenagel macrocyclic SB ligand. Antimicrobial activity was determined by using the well dilution method against bacteria (two Gram-positive, Staphylococcus aureus , Bacillus subtilis , and three Gram-negative, Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Salmonella typhi ) compared with the standard kanamycin (MIC = 1.4, 1.2, 1.8, 2.2 and 2.0 µM, respectively) and fungi ( Aspergillus niger , Fusarium solani , Aspergillus flavus , Rhizoctonia bataticola , Candida albicans ) compared with the standard fluconazole (MIC = 1.2, 1.5, 1.2, 1.8 and 1.8 µM, respectively).…”
Section: Mononuclear Sbs Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%