2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of the Single-hit DNA Damage Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray irradiation is known to generate mainly strand breaks (single and double stranded), but that could be a rather infrequent event which only matters in a large genome such as the nuclear [20]. This suggestion is in agreement with experiments from Spangler and co-authors [21] who found that DNA damage from γ-irradiation was most consistent with a single-hit mechanism and did not differ in DNA fragments of different size; again suggesting it to be a rather rare event. DNA repair in mtDNA after high doses of irradiation has not been investigated very intensely, most studies instead focused on mutation rates, changes in mtDNA copy numbers [22,23] or found a relaxation in supercoiling of the double stranded mitochondrial DNA [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…X-ray irradiation is known to generate mainly strand breaks (single and double stranded), but that could be a rather infrequent event which only matters in a large genome such as the nuclear [20]. This suggestion is in agreement with experiments from Spangler and co-authors [21] who found that DNA damage from γ-irradiation was most consistent with a single-hit mechanism and did not differ in DNA fragments of different size; again suggesting it to be a rather rare event. DNA repair in mtDNA after high doses of irradiation has not been investigated very intensely, most studies instead focused on mutation rates, changes in mtDNA copy numbers [22,23] or found a relaxation in supercoiling of the double stranded mitochondrial DNA [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Treatment with ultraviolet light below 320 nm (UVB or UVC) is effective at making DNA resistant to amplification [8], but ultraviolet light that inactivates DNA also reduces the efficiency of Taq polymerase [4], [6], [9]–[11]. Application of ultrafiltration with Millipore filters (YM100) was reported to reduce Taq polymerase sensitivity in one case [12], but not in another [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a given microbiome DNA sequence should be interpreted differently depending on whether the corresponding microbe was metabolically active, but DNA sequences alone do not provide information on whether identified sequences come from organisms that were metabolically active, quiescent, or dead. DNA sequencing can be supported by methods that discriminate microbial viability at the time of sampling [53] and the intact nature [54] of target DNA, whilst certain VOCs are consequent to microbial metabolism [44]. However, these approaches are not always sensitive and are not likely to be robust across the range of microbial and environmental diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%