1971
DOI: 10.1093/jee/64.5.1193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of Aerosols of Deet for Protection of Livestock from Biting Flies12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experimental and domestic animals, similar skin reactions have been described (AMBROSE 1959; KEPLINGER et at. 1961;MORISON et al 1963;PALMER 1969;KURASOVA & LESHCHEV 1969;BLUME et al 1971), again frequently showing dose dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In experimental and domestic animals, similar skin reactions have been described (AMBROSE 1959; KEPLINGER et at. 1961;MORISON et al 1963;PALMER 1969;KURASOVA & LESHCHEV 1969;BLUME et al 1971), again frequently showing dose dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since its first commercial application in 1956, DEET has become one of the most widely used insect repellents in both human and veterinary use. 12 Repeated studies show that DEET is highly efficient in repelling a wide variety of arthropods, [17][18][19][20][21][22] particularly with respect to mosquitoes, sand flies, and ticks given their major role in spreading diseases in both human and animals. In most cases, a single skin application of DEET was effective in repelling the insects for several hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed as a mosquito repellent (2), DEET successfully repels several genera of mosquitoes (3–6). DEET affects many other blood‐seeking invertebrates as well, including sand flies (7), assassin bugs (8), Simuliid flies (9), Tsetse flies (10), face flies (11), ticks (12,13), and even leeches (14). That DEET also affects fruit flies suggests an invertebrate‐repelling mechanism not limited to the prevention of blood feeding (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%