2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the significance of the RV coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
142
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, immune populations distant on CA dimensions have opposite representations in the patient population. (B) Similarity estimated through RV coefficients 18 between immune patterns of controls and transplant recipients at the same time points. RV coefficients (black squares) closer to 1 denote greater similarity between immune patterns of patients and controls.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, immune populations distant on CA dimensions have opposite representations in the patient population. (B) Similarity estimated through RV coefficients 18 between immune patterns of controls and transplant recipients at the same time points. RV coefficients (black squares) closer to 1 denote greater similarity between immune patterns of patients and controls.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RV-coefficient (ranging from 0 to 1) was used to measure the similarity between the geometrical representations derived from each groups of variables [51]. RVcoefficients are then tested by permutations [29]. Euclidean distances of global PCA were used in MFA to perform cluster analysis according to the Ward method, and the resulting dendrogram was projected in the MFA ordination space.…”
Section: Numerical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the significance of the Rv coefficient was determined using a permutation test [29]. To visually compare the similarity between the sensory configurations of the samples obtained through both methodologies, a multi factorial analysis (MFA) was performed on the coordinates of the samples in the first two dimensions of the corresponding CA.…”
Section: Comparison Of Obtained Sensory Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the results obtained using the PP methodology and its variant using CATA questions, the correlation coefficient Rv between the coordinate matrices of the samples was determined in the first two dimensions of the respective correspondence analysis [28]. In addition, the significance of the Rv coefficient was determined using a permutation test [29]. To visually compare the similarity between the sensory configurations of the samples obtained through both methodologies, a multi factorial analysis (MFA) was performed on the coordinates of the samples in the first two dimensions of the corresponding CA.…”
Section: Comparison Of Obtained Sensory Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%