“…This is why the Pivot technique (Thuillier et al, 2015) can be a suitable tool for the analysis of adulterated food since: it can be carried out with consumers, its execution is easy, it allows the comparison of products (Pivot or reference sample vs. other samples) and the results can be analyzed using different multivariate techniques available in the field of food adulteration such as discriminant analysis (DA), correspondence analysis (CA), among others (Karoui, Mazerolles, Bosset, de Baerdemaeker, & Dufour, 2007). However, in order to use the Pivot technique for adulterated food, it is necessary to per- Miraballes, Hodos, and Gámbaro (2018) and Pearson et al (2020), the Pivot sample is used only to perform the paired comparison of samples without determining their respective intensity values for each attribute, which may be a limitation for the comparison of results. For all the above, the objective of this study was to modify the Pivot sensory technique and determine its suitability for the sensory analysis of adulterated coffees.…”