Testing the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint

Abstract

Although it has been widely assumed in historical linguistics that semantics plays a crucial role in analogical change, it is difficult to pinpoint the contribution of the semantic factor, since meaning and form work closely together in bringing about language change. The purpose of the present article is to shed light on the issue by means of two case studies from Russian, which enable us to isolate the role of semantics. The hypothesis we test is that analogical change is restricted to semantically homogeneous domains. We call this the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint. Two phenomena from Russian conjugation are explored: suffix shift and NU-drop. Although they seem parallel, analogical change occurs in the former, but not in the latter. It is argued that this is because the verbs involved in suffix shift constitute a semantically homogeneous domain, within which analogical change can take place. By contrast, NU-verbs are semantically diverse, and these semantic differences create boundaries which block analogical change. The findings have implications both for Russian and general linguistics. While suffix shift and NU-drop are well-known phenomena in Russian conjugation, they have not been juxtaposed and compared before. Our comparison provides new insights about the differences and similarities of the two phenomena. From the perspective of historical linguistics, the present article contributes to the theory of analogy, insofar as we provide empirical evidence for the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint, which places restrictions on semantic domains where analogical change can take place.

Searching for a Common Ancestry: Linguistic and Biological Analogies in Comic Art

“…In the field of linguistics, analogy has been defined as 'a change made by influence of another form in the same paradigm' (Basilio 2006), and is used to show the change from the 'before' to the 'after' state (Nesset and Makarova 2014). Here we do not use the concept of linguistic analogy in the strict sense of studying the changes in the development of a language, but as the cognitive process that involves linking the information provided by two distinct elements by comparing their similarities (Fischer 2019).…”

“…If a potential source and corresponding copy can be detected with a level of certainty from contextual documentary evidence (for example biographical or bibliographical sources), it should be possible to apply the concept of linguistic analogy to explain the phenomenon of recurrent images. According to Nesset and Makarova (2014) this is a principle of the linguistic analogy. We see in these examples the expression of, as Benjamin called it, 'a secret agreement' or meeting between a previous generation (Lee's and Ditko's) and a younger one (Hernandez's).…”

The Evolution of Etymons Denoting an Inhabited Place in Ukrainian and English

“…It should be noted that diachronic developments of individual lexical units and their groupings (Dobrovolska, 2017) have been in the focus of historical linguistics (Nesset & Makarova, 2014), because they enable scholars to trace the history of an individual word, the evolution of its meaning, productive word-building models, specific features and types of structural and semantic changes (Tsaregorodtseva, 2009; Shatalova, 2011) and, on a broader scale, the patterns of vocabulary development. Etymology, which is exclusively diachronic (Dworkin, 2015), involves the study of the word origin (Malkiel, 1993;Toporov, 2004), their primary word-formation structure and elements of their ancient meaning that help to identify the specificity of the development of the language's lexical system in general and its individual groups (Dworkin, 2015).…”