2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-012-9349-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Effectiveness of Mathematical Games as a Pedagogical Tool for Children’s Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
12
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to a few studies reporting the positive effects of peer interactions on students' engagement and performance (Bragg, 2012;Corredor, 2018), this research instead revealed that students' high-level peer interactions could not promote their task efficiency and learning engagement. Rather, their peer interactions interrupted their reflection on how their game actions should be refined.…”
Section: Students' Peer Interaction Effectcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to a few studies reporting the positive effects of peer interactions on students' engagement and performance (Bragg, 2012;Corredor, 2018), this research instead revealed that students' high-level peer interactions could not promote their task efficiency and learning engagement. Rather, their peer interactions interrupted their reflection on how their game actions should be refined.…”
Section: Students' Peer Interaction Effectcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Setarea was as effective as the active-learning unit at raising the students' understanding. Similar findings were reported by Bragg (2012a) and Siegler and Ramani (2008). However, the main difference between the two approaches was the teacher's and students' roles.…”
Section: Figure 8: Interactions Among Students During Game Missionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Third, cognitive engagement is concerned with students’ perseverance (e.g., not giving up but doing more than expected in solving mathematics problems) and use of cognitive strategies in the learning process (e.g., handling a lot of information in mathematics problem‐solving) (Fredricks et al., ; Mahatmya, Lohman, & Matjasko, & Farb, ; Walker, Greene, & Mansell, ). Cognitively engaged students have higher levels of academic achievement (Greene, Miller, Crowson, Duke, & Akey, ; Sedaghat et al, ; Spanjers, ), possibly because these students are more interested in learning mathematics (Bal, ; Bragg, , ; Thatcher, ; Thiessen & Blasius, ).…”
Section: Main Effects Of Student Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%