2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the effect of site selection and parameter setting on REVEALS-model estimates of plant abundance using the Czech Quaternary Palynological Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
292
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
292
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption has effectively also been made previously (Hellman et al, 2008) and more recently by the LANDCLIM project (Gaillard et al, 2010). Mazier et al (2012a) showed that different values of Z max (i.e. 50, 100 and 200 km) did not affect the vegetation reconstruction obtained from fossil pollen data via the LRA approach.…”
Section: Location Of the Sample Pointsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption has effectively also been made previously (Hellman et al, 2008) and more recently by the LANDCLIM project (Gaillard et al, 2010). Mazier et al (2012a) showed that different values of Z max (i.e. 50, 100 and 200 km) did not affect the vegetation reconstruction obtained from fossil pollen data via the LRA approach.…”
Section: Location Of the Sample Pointsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Sugita, 2007aSugita, , 2007bBunting and Middleton, 2009) assume that the pollen productivity of a given taxon relative to other taxa is effectively constant in space and time (that is, that the pollen production of all the taxa of interest responds to changes in climate or landscape structure in the same way). Considerable research effort has been invested in measuring Relative Pollen Productivity and multiple studies in northern Europe since 2001 have indicated wide variations in estimated values for common taxa (reviewed in Broström et al, 2008;Mazier et al 2012a). Bunting and Hjelle (2010) showed that one important element in the range of RPP estimates from different studies is variation in the methods of vegetation data collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability of pollen assemblages from small sites is often high, which explains the large error estimates on REVEALS results based on pollen data from small sites. Empirical tests (Mazier et al 2012;Fyfe et al 2013) using pollen data from multiple small sites (lakes and/or bogs) support the theory, i.e. the results from Sugita simulations (2007a).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, pollen productivity estimates (PPEs)-a parameter required for the application of REVEALS-are available for the major plant taxa of the region (e.g. Broström et al 2008;Mazier et al 2012) and the REVEALS model was tested using modern pollen and vegetation data of that same region and was shown to perform satisfactorily (Hellman et al 2008a, b).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation