1991
DOI: 10.2307/3676546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Behavioural Dominance and Dispersal Hypothesis in Pochard

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual size dimorphism is also likely to have implications during the non‐breeding season. For instance, the larger sex may be better able to survive on colder sites (large‐scale sexual segregation) (Choudhury and Black ; Gill et al. ; Cristol et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sexual size dimorphism is also likely to have implications during the non‐breeding season. For instance, the larger sex may be better able to survive on colder sites (large‐scale sexual segregation) (Choudhury and Black ; Gill et al. ; Cristol et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual size dimorphism is also likely to have implications during the non-breeding season. For instance, the larger sex may be better able to survive on colder sites (large-scale sexual segregation) (Choudhury and Black 1991;Gill et al 1995;Cristol et al 1999), or the sexes may winter in the same location, but forage on different types or sizes of prey (small-scale sexual segregation) (Summers et al 1990;Durrell et al 1993;Temeles et al 2000;Zharikov and Skilleter 2002;Nebel and Thompson 2005). Large-scale sexual segregation may result in the sexes wintering in distinct parts of the range and experiencing different environmental conditions and migration distances, and consequently different energetic demands (Alves et al 2012a(Alves et al , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies suggest the winter behavioural dominance of males over females (e.g. Hepp & Hair 1984, Brodsky et al 1988, which may ultimately affect access to food reserves (Alexander 1987, Choudhury & Black 1991, suggesting density-dependent access to optimal food resources would favour males, a factor thought to contribute to a skewed adult male sex bias. Nor can we find convincing arguments why male ducks should be more sensitive to other environmental factors that might enhance their representation in the hunting bag over females.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, keeping spring migration route short at the expense of wintering in colder areas close to the wintering line would ensure quick and less energy demanding trip to the breeding grounds, whilst wintering further away from wintering line and breeding grounds might be more beneficial strategy for individual survival, but not for reproductive success (Bregnballe et al, 2006;Steffen et al, 2008). Choice between these two strategies also is known to be species-, sex-, and age-dependent and often result in segregation of different groups at different latitudes (Choundhury and Black, 1991;Rustamov and Kovshar, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%