2021
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2021.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the area–altitude balance ratio (AABR) and accumulation–area ratio (AAR) methods of calculating glacier equilibrium-line altitudes

Abstract: In this study, we compare equilibrium-line altitudes (ELAs) calculated using the area–altitude balance ratio (AABR) and the accumulation–area ratio (AAR) methods, with measured ELAs derived from direct field observations. We utilise a GIS toolbox to calculate the ELA for 64 extant glaciers by applying the AABR and AAR methods to DEMs and polygons of their geometry. The calculated ELAs (c-ELAs) are then compared to measured zero-net balance ELAs (znb-ELAs) obtained from mass-balance time series held by the WGMS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(102 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AAR method is suitable when reconstructing ELAs on small and simple glacier systems (Osmaston 2005; Oien et al . 2021). The ELA based on AAR of G1 (168±13 m a.s.l.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The AAR method is suitable when reconstructing ELAs on small and simple glacier systems (Osmaston 2005; Oien et al . 2021). The ELA based on AAR of G1 (168±13 m a.s.l.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oien et al . (2021) found a very strong correlation between the calculated AABR ELA and measured zero‐net balance ELAs of modern Scandinavian glaciers, using a mean regional BR of 1.5 ( r 2 = 0.92, n = 18) (Oien et al . 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The few direct measurements available from the Mocho Glacier (Rivera et al, 2005;Schaefer et al, 2017), situated about 115 km to the south, suggest a balance ratio of 3.2, larger than figures commonly used, such as 1.75 or 2 (Osmaston, 2005). A recent study found that a value of 1.56 represents glaciers at a global scale, although with important spread (Oien et al, 2021). Guided by these studies, we tested several ratios, opting for 2.38 as a best approximation to represent this region.…”
Section: Glacial Modelingmentioning
confidence: 96%