“…The most recent studies consider an alpine (glacial, periglacial and paraglacial) geomorphological model as a framework for palaeoglaciation and palaeoclimate reconstruction. This has either focused on applying absolute/relative dating methods and/or numerical ice modelling (Balaban, 2018; Gheorghiu, 2012; Gheorghiu et al, 2015; Ignéczi & Nagy, 2016; Kłapyta et al, 2021, 2022; Kłapyta, Mîndrescu, & Zasadni, 2023; Kłapyta, Zasadni, & Mîndrescu, 2023; Kuhlemann, Dobre, et al, 2013; László et al, 2013; Reuther et al, 2007; Ruszkiczay‐Rüdiger et al, 2016, 2021; Tîrlă et al, 2020; Urdea & Reuther, 2009), or conducting quantitative inventories of landform characteristics (Gunnell et al, 2022; Mîndrescu & Evans, 2014, 2017; Mîndrescu et al, 2010; Necșoiu et al, 2016; Onaca, Ardelean, et al, 2017; Onaca et al, 2013; Popescu, 2018; Popescu et al, 2021; Popescu, Onaca, Urdea & Vespremeanu‐Stroe, 2017; Șerban et al, 2019; Vasile et al, 2022; Vespremeanu‐Stroe et al, 2012). Despite this work, the relationships between palaeoclimate, geomorphology, and glaciation style and dynamics, particularly in a mountain landsystem context, remain poorly understood.…”