2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Accuracy of Data-driven MHD Simulations of Active Region Evolution

Abstract: Models for the evolution of the solar coronal magnetic field are vital for understanding solar activity, yet the best measurements of magnetic field lie at the photosphere, necessitating the development of coronal models which are "data-driven" at the photosphere. We present an investigation to determine the feasibility and accuracy of such methods. Our validation framework uses a simulation of active region (AR) formation, modeling the emergence of magnetic flux from the convection zone to the corona, as a gr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the viewpoint of applying data-driven models to actual observational data, the lower temporal cadence of the photospheric boundary data may cause additional issue. Leake et al (2017) pointed out that for rapidly evolving features such as emerging flux, undersampling of the dynamics generates large electric currents and incorrect coronal fields and energies. Moreover, we should be aware that the observational data inherently contain some uncertainties (e.g., noise and 180 • ambiguity).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the viewpoint of applying data-driven models to actual observational data, the lower temporal cadence of the photospheric boundary data may cause additional issue. Leake et al (2017) pointed out that for rapidly evolving features such as emerging flux, undersampling of the dynamics generates large electric currents and incorrect coronal fields and energies. Moreover, we should be aware that the observational data inherently contain some uncertainties (e.g., noise and 180 • ambiguity).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fields are required for quantifying the transport of magnetic flux, energy and helicity from the solar interior through the photosphere to the chromosphere and corona (Liu and Schuck, 2012;Tziotziou, Georgoulis, and Liu, 2013;Kazachenko et al, 2015). They also form the essential input for data-driven modeling of the corona (Wiegelmann, Petrie, and Riley, 2015;Inoue, 2016;Leake, Linton, and Schuck, 2017), in which the fields are used to specify the boundary condition at the lower radial boundary of the simulations. Due to the sparsity of direct observations of many of the key quantities that characterize the coronal plasma -most prominently the magnetic field -data-driven simulations offer currently the most feasible and often the only way to quantify the dynamics of the corona.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate estimation of the Poynting and helicity fluxes is of significant practical value when the photospheric velocity/electric fields are used to derive the photospheric boundary condition for data-driven coronal modeling, in which case the boundary condition controls the injection of these quantities to the simulation domain. Such data-driven models vary in complexity ranging from simple static (non-linear) force-free field models employing only the magnetic field as the boundary condition (see e.g., Wiegelmann and Sakurai, 2012) to full time-dependent MHD models employing fully consistent photospheric boundary conditions (e.g., Jiang et al, 2016, Leake, Linton, andSchuck, 2017). In terms of complexity there exists a model between these extremes called the Timedependent MagnetoFrictional method (which we henceforth abbreviate as the TMF method).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New simultaneous multiwavelength, multi-height observations will directly offer the crucial information. Simulations for the volume crossing the solar surface (e.g., Amari et al 2004;Abbett 2007;Fan 2009;Toriumi & Yokoyama 2012;Leake et al 2017) will help determine theorybased vertical gradients. We will improve our MHD model in the future, by incorporating these sophisticated models and new observations in order to enhance our understanding on the energy build-up and conversion processes in AR systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%