2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing phenomenological and theoretical models of dark matter density profiles with galaxy clusters

Abstract: We use the stacked gravitational lensing mass profile of four high-mass (M 10 15 M ⊙ ) galaxy clusters around z ≈ 0.3 from Umetsu et al. to fit density profiles of phenomenological [Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW), Einasto, Sérsic, Stadel, Baltz-Marshall-Oguri (BMO) and Hernquist] and theoretical (non-singular Isothermal Sphere, DARKexp and Kang & He) models of the dark matter distribution. We account for large-scale structure effects, including a 2-halo term in the analysis. We find that the BMO model provides the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(70 reference statements)
3
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we concentrate our attention on the neighborhood of E = Φ(0), that is to the center of the system, where we perform an accurate asymptotic analysis. In this respect, our findings do not hinder the fitting of DARKexp predictions to observations and N −body simulations, which is reported to be quite good [20,[25][26][27]. Indeed, no cusp/core ambiguity may arise when the DARKexp n(E) is directly compared to the differential energy distribution extracted from N −body simulations [20,27], while the direct comparison of the DARKexp mass density, numerically computed as in [19], to that of astrophysical objects [25,26] and of N −body simulations [27] are restricted to distances too large to distinguish a cusp from a small core.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…In particular, we concentrate our attention on the neighborhood of E = Φ(0), that is to the center of the system, where we perform an accurate asymptotic analysis. In this respect, our findings do not hinder the fitting of DARKexp predictions to observations and N −body simulations, which is reported to be quite good [20,[25][26][27]. Indeed, no cusp/core ambiguity may arise when the DARKexp n(E) is directly compared to the differential energy distribution extracted from N −body simulations [20,27], while the direct comparison of the DARKexp mass density, numerically computed as in [19], to that of astrophysical objects [25,26] and of N −body simulations [27] are restricted to distances too large to distinguish a cusp from a small core.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, the resulting density profile can be fit to gravitational lensing data from galaxy clusters, as done for other models in [11]. Another direct test can be made with data from rotation curves of spiral galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation function ξ hm (r) is, in fact, an average of the observed overdensity around halos of similar masses, ρ h,obs (r) , since ξ hm (r) = ρ h,obs (r) /ρ m − 1. In the context of the halo model, the average observed overdensity is given by the sum of two contributions [33,[37][38][39],…”
Section: Halo Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%