2013
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2013.2243798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of RF 100 m TF Qualification Conductor in the SULTAN Test Facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, all samples but one met the 5.8 K after 1000 EM cycles. Looking at the details of the results, it appears that all RF samples show good performance with no cycling degradation (there is even usually a small increase of T Cs over the first 50 to 100 EM cycles, the origin of which will be discussed later) [57][58]. The EU samples are reproducible, but appear very close to the limit after EM cycling (this particular conductor design was optimized to perform in such fashion) [54].…”
Section: Sultan Sample Summarymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this case, all samples but one met the 5.8 K after 1000 EM cycles. Looking at the details of the results, it appears that all RF samples show good performance with no cycling degradation (there is even usually a small increase of T Cs over the first 50 to 100 EM cycles, the origin of which will be discussed later) [57][58]. The EU samples are reproducible, but appear very close to the limit after EM cycling (this particular conductor design was optimized to perform in such fashion) [54].…”
Section: Sultan Sample Summarymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The main dimensions of the samples are approximately the same. The results of the tests of all samples were sufficient and met ITER requirements [6][7][8]. However the results of the TF samples tests were quite unexpected because no current sharing temperature (T cs ) degradation was observed [6,7].…”
Section: Tf and Pf Conductorsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…We also attempted to compare our results with [6], where the strands from the TFEU5 conductor were examined. The drop of T cs after testing in SULTAN in TFEU5 was 0.35 K [6] against 0.1 K in TFRF3 [8]. We have converted our results into cracks/mm terms used in [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the TFRF3 sample the results of Tcs measurements performed during electromagnetic cycling were stable between 6.10-6.15 K [8]. The only drop of 0.1 K was observed after warm-up and cool down (WUCD) with the final Tcs value of 6.05 K. Considering the value of the drop, this sample shows very good stability and EM cycling resistance among other ITER conductors where the average difference between initial and final Tcs values reaches up 0.4 K [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation