Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3193992.3194000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing meets static and runtime verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RV can complement and has been used in combination with other formal static verification methods such as model checking [26], deductive verification [12] and static analysis [15,9,12,4], as well as informal dynamic methods such as testing [13] and debugging [23]. While a complete a priori verification is ideally desirable for verifying program correctness, proving the correctness of many properties is fundamentally undecidable statically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RV can complement and has been used in combination with other formal static verification methods such as model checking [26], deductive verification [12] and static analysis [15,9,12,4], as well as informal dynamic methods such as testing [13] and debugging [23]. While a complete a priori verification is ideally desirable for verifying program correctness, proving the correctness of many properties is fundamentally undecidable statically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static analysis has been widely used for performing multiple types of program properties verification, such as vulnerability/bug detection, test case generation, and compiler optimizations [5,7,12,15,23,36]. At the core of many of those analyses is the program's call graph, which establishes the relationships between callers and callees [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%