EducationalTesting Service is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer.Copyright© 1992 by EducationalTesting Service. All right reserved.No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronicor mechanical, includingphotocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrievalsystem, without permission in writing from the publisher. Violators will be prosecutedin accordance with bothUS and international copyrightlaws.EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE, ETS, the ETS logo,TOEFL,and the TOEFL logo are registered trademarksof Educational Testing Service.
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to align verbal descriptions of test takers' language performance with distributions of the numerical scores they received on the three sections (Listening Comprehension, structure and written Expression, and Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary) of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL).The study used the American council of Teaching Foreign Languages (ACTFL) descriptors as anchors for the TOEFL scores. The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines, from which the descriptors were taken, are widely used.Qualified English as a Second Language (ESL) instructors rated their students' listening, reading, and writing proficiency using the ACTFL descriptors. Very shortly thereafter, the ratees took the TOEFL. Students' ACTFL ratings were quantified and cross-tabulated with TOEFL section scores.Results were analyzed as follows: First, the need to adjust for rater difficulty was investigated. Second, typical descriptive data were developed. Third, several schemes were used to quantify the verbal descriptors from the ACTFL Guidelines.Fourth, the ratings and test scores were correlated. Fifth, the issue of the differential validity of the measures of speaking, listening, and reading was examined. Sixth, several estimates of the reliability of the ratings were obtained. Finally, the distributions of ratings at levels of the TOEFL section scores were developed. These latter distributions can be helpful in interpreting TOEFL scores in terms of language performance. Although there was no one-to-one correspondence between the TOEFL score level and the ACTFL rating level, the correlations between ratings and scores were substantial.The Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFl!) was developed in 1963 by the National Council on the Testing ofEnglish as a Foreign Language, which was formed through the cooperative effort of more than thirty organizations, public and private, that were concerned with testing the English proficiency of nonnative speakers of the language applying for admission to institutions in the United States. In 1965, Educational Testing Service (ETS) and the College Board assumed joint responsibility for the program, and in 1973, a cooperative arrangement for the operation of the program was entered into by ETS, the College Board, and the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) Board. The membership of the College Board is composed of schools, colleges, school systems, and educational asso...