2016
DOI: 10.1108/jes-07-2014-0128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for bubbles in the BRICS stock markets

Abstract: In this study, we apply the generalized sup Augmented Dickey-Fuller (GSADF) test, a new recursive test proposed by Phillips et al. (2013) to investigate whether there exist multiple bubbles in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) stock markets, using monthly data on stock price-dividend ratio. Our empirical results indicate that there exist multiple bubbles in the stock markets of the BRICS. Further, the dates of the bubbles also correspond to specific events in the stocks markets of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Jiang et al () use a faster‐than‐exponential (power law with finite‐time singularity) increase in stock prices as the main diagnostic of bubbles over the May 2005 to August 2009 sample, and detect two bubbles from mid‐2005 to October 2007 and from November 2008 to August 2009. In contrast, Asako and Liu (), over the 1999–2010 period, only detect significant bubbles in April–May and August–October 2007, and Chang, Gil‐Alana, Aye, Gupta, and Ranjbar (), over 1995 to 2013, find very short‐lived bubbles early and late 2007. Few papers specifically conduct formal tests for the presence of bubbles using China's housing price data (such as Ren, Xiong, & Yuan, , with duration‐dependence tests; and Liu, Chang, Su, & Jiang, , with city data) and the use of (biased) publicly available data restricts them to low frequencies (monthly or yearly).…”
Section: Literature On China's Stock and Real Estate Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, Jiang et al () use a faster‐than‐exponential (power law with finite‐time singularity) increase in stock prices as the main diagnostic of bubbles over the May 2005 to August 2009 sample, and detect two bubbles from mid‐2005 to October 2007 and from November 2008 to August 2009. In contrast, Asako and Liu (), over the 1999–2010 period, only detect significant bubbles in April–May and August–October 2007, and Chang, Gil‐Alana, Aye, Gupta, and Ranjbar (), over 1995 to 2013, find very short‐lived bubbles early and late 2007. Few papers specifically conduct formal tests for the presence of bubbles using China's housing price data (such as Ren, Xiong, & Yuan, , with duration‐dependence tests; and Liu, Chang, Su, & Jiang, , with city data) and the use of (biased) publicly available data restricts them to low frequencies (monthly or yearly).…”
Section: Literature On China's Stock and Real Estate Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The findings found no bubbles in the stock markets of these countries. Chang et al (2015) examined the presence of multiple bubbles by using the GSADF unit root (2013) test in their study of BRICS stock markets. As a result of the study, in which the monthly data are used for the share prices and the profit share distribution ratios, it has been understood that the bubbles in the stock markets of these countries have occurred in the case of specific events.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different research studies were conducted using the SADF and the GSADF strategies to identify episodes of exuberance in the stock markets. Chang et al (2014) apply the GSADF strategy to test if there are multiple bubbles in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) stock markets. The results indicate that there are several bubbles on the BRICS stock markets and the dates of bubble correspond to particular events in the stock markets of these countries.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%