1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1765(99)00073-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing for a break at an unknown change-point: a test with known size in small samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 The disadvantage of this method is that it locates only one change-point. However, this restriction is not as important if the objective is to find out if and when a significant reduction in crashes began in a time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8,9 The disadvantage of this method is that it locates only one change-point. However, this restriction is not as important if the objective is to find out if and when a significant reduction in crashes began in a time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers who are interested in interval estimates are encouraged to follow up on the references provided. [7][8][9]12,13 Results Figure 1 shows the number of fatal crashes per month in New Zealand, between January 1990 and December 1997, that involved at least one male driver under the age of 25. The change-point was estimated to be around December 1992.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline specification that adds the GDP and wealth elasticities up to one is the preferred specification, because money adjusts then, as theoretically expected, one‐to‐one to changes in real and financial transactions in the long run. In order to check the stability of the results, Greene (1999) Min P tests are applied for possible breaks in Stage III of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). This stability test is based on the minimum probability value of a sequence of Chow forecast tests with an unknown breakpoint.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an econometric model of the determinants of the changes in tariffs would not be appropriate with the limited number of observations available and in the presence of 'non-quantifiable' institutional and political factors on these industries. in the slope of the variables, between the different institutional regimes are significant 10 (Chow 1960, Greene 1999.…”
Section: Data Set and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 97%