2016
DOI: 10.1111/str.12172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Concrete E‐modulus at Very Early Ages Through Several Techniques: An Inter‐laboratory Comparison

Abstract: The design of concrete structures is based on calculation rules, which often do not take into account the very early age behaviour of the material. However, during this period, structural concrete is subjected to strains due to the hydration process of cement. If these strains are restrained by concrete itself or surrounding boundaries, stresses start to build up that can lead to the formation of cracks. Among the parameters involved in the stress build up, the stiffness evolution is of major importance. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, this testing method was adopted by several research groups, universities and institutions worldwide, contributing to a breadth of investigations regarding the early age viscoelastic behaviour of concrete. Some of them comprised of the evaluation of cracking sensitivity of concretes due to autogenous shrinkage at various temperatures with and without reinforcement, 72–75 self‐induced stresses in high‐performance concrete, 76,77 effects of mix composition and mineral additions 78,79 or even the determination of the elastic properties of concrete since setting 80–84 . The TSTM apparatuses used in these studies had the similar operating principles and testing set‐up configurations, with some differences originating from the positioning of sensors, size of specimen, existence of thermal regulation system, loading control system, deformation threshold value and starting time of tests, as already mentioned for a few studies in Staquet et al 85…”
Section: State Of the Art Review Of Longitudinal Testing Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, this testing method was adopted by several research groups, universities and institutions worldwide, contributing to a breadth of investigations regarding the early age viscoelastic behaviour of concrete. Some of them comprised of the evaluation of cracking sensitivity of concretes due to autogenous shrinkage at various temperatures with and without reinforcement, 72–75 self‐induced stresses in high‐performance concrete, 76,77 effects of mix composition and mineral additions 78,79 or even the determination of the elastic properties of concrete since setting 80–84 . The TSTM apparatuses used in these studies had the similar operating principles and testing set‐up configurations, with some differences originating from the positioning of sensors, size of specimen, existence of thermal regulation system, loading control system, deformation threshold value and starting time of tests, as already mentioned for a few studies in Staquet et al 85…”
Section: State Of the Art Review Of Longitudinal Testing Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a value of the dynamic Poisson's ratio of ν dyn ≈ 0.3 at 28 days [38], the dynamic E-modulus is 36 GPa.…”
Section: Monitoring Of the Hardening Phase Using Upv Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then loads are applied at ages of 2, 3, 7, 14 and 28 days. A complete description of the device, the test protocol and the data processing is indicated in [4,17,18].…”
Section: Monitoring Of the Elastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%