2020
DOI: 10.1111/str.12343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal restraining devices for the evaluation of structural behaviour of cement‐based materials: The past, present and prospective trends

Abstract: The problem of thermal and shrinkage cracking in concrete has been long recognised by researchers and engineers as it can jeopardise the intended serviceability of a concrete structure. This has led researchers to develop testing devices which aim to simulate the behaviour of concrete under restrained deformations. Such devices are discerned in passive and active, depending on how concrete's movement is restrained, whilst a new type of devices has been developed to account for the combined effects of intrinsic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 99 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The restraint ring test [9,10], the slab test [11,12], the uniaxial restraint test (e.g., the rigid cracking frame (RCF) [13][14][15] and the temperature stress testing machine (TSTM) [16][17][18][19][20]) are some common methods in the lab for evaluation of restraint cracking sensitivity of concrete, and other recently developed restraining devices (e.g., drying shrinkage restraining rig, variable restraint testing machine) also have played a positive role on restraint cracking potential evaluation, which can be found in the literature written by Kanavaris et al [21]. It is known that the classical restraint ring and the slab test cannot reflect the temperature effect on the cracking potential of earlyage concrete due to the lacking of temperature controlling parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restraint ring test [9,10], the slab test [11,12], the uniaxial restraint test (e.g., the rigid cracking frame (RCF) [13][14][15] and the temperature stress testing machine (TSTM) [16][17][18][19][20]) are some common methods in the lab for evaluation of restraint cracking sensitivity of concrete, and other recently developed restraining devices (e.g., drying shrinkage restraining rig, variable restraint testing machine) also have played a positive role on restraint cracking potential evaluation, which can be found in the literature written by Kanavaris et al [21]. It is known that the classical restraint ring and the slab test cannot reflect the temperature effect on the cracking potential of earlyage concrete due to the lacking of temperature controlling parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%