2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and clinical implications for non‐V600 BRAF mutations in metastatic NRAS mt melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BRAF V600E represents 85% of BRAF V600 mutations [ 4 ]. Historically, NRAS and BRAF mutations were described as mutually exclusive [ 5 ], but the advances of genetic knowledge and the wider genetic screening are reeling us away from this old truth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BRAF V600E represents 85% of BRAF V600 mutations [ 4 ]. Historically, NRAS and BRAF mutations were described as mutually exclusive [ 5 ], but the advances of genetic knowledge and the wider genetic screening are reeling us away from this old truth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRAF class I mutations ( BRAF V600E / V600K or V600R ) correspond to BRAF V600 , leading to a monomer with an activity 500 fold superior to wild type BRAF [ 5 ], causing enhanced activity of the MAP Kinase pathway through a RAS – independent signal. They are responsive to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi): vemurafenib, dabrafenib, encorafenib.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the response rate to MEK inhibitors is variable, suggesting that NRAS signaling does not solely act on the MAPK pathway [35]. In the literature, new mutations in the MAPK pathway and other pathways involved in proliferation and growth have been suggested as putative escape mechanism, but it might also be possible that there are some epigenetic modifications involved [36]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%