2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing a dual-process model of avoidant defenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(44 reference statements)
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, attachment-avoidance manifests in the tendency to inhibit acknowledgment of relationship threats. Defensive exclusion during information processing (e.g., perception, encoding, appraisal), memorization and retrieval (Chun, Shaver, Gillath, Mathews, & Jorgensen, 2015;Fraley & Brumbaugh, 2007) leads to higher emotional inhibition and suppression in avoidant individuals. Hence, avoidant individuals tend to be kept from noticing their own attachment-related distress, and may report fewer transgressions in their relationships.…”
Section: Attachment and Perceived Transgression Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, attachment-avoidance manifests in the tendency to inhibit acknowledgment of relationship threats. Defensive exclusion during information processing (e.g., perception, encoding, appraisal), memorization and retrieval (Chun, Shaver, Gillath, Mathews, & Jorgensen, 2015;Fraley & Brumbaugh, 2007) leads to higher emotional inhibition and suppression in avoidant individuals. Hence, avoidant individuals tend to be kept from noticing their own attachment-related distress, and may report fewer transgressions in their relationships.…”
Section: Attachment and Perceived Transgression Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there was no association of attachment avoidance with overall maternal verbosity, this indicates that mothers higher in avoidance may exhibit a difference in quality, rather than quantity, of infant-directed utterances, demonstrating less of a mental state focus than their less avoidant counterparts. This pattern of associations is consistent with the deactivating strategy associated with this attachment dimension (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2012), and may be underpinned by emotionally-avoidant processing biases (Chun et al, 2015;Edelstein & Gillath, 2008;Guerrero, 1996;Tucker & Anders, 1998) and reduced mental state focus (Bourne et al, 2014;Meins et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As hypothesised, mother's greater maternal attachment avoidance predicted her lower use of appropriate mind-related comments during a play interaction with her child, with this possibly reflecting a deactivating attachment strategy for these mothers (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991;, with associated avoidant attentional biases (Chun et al, 2015) and reduced mental state focus (Bourne et al, 2014;Meins et al, 2008). While attachment anxiety was not hypothesised to be associated with maternal mind-mindedness, it was unexpected to find that greater endorsement of this attachment dimension predicted higher appropriate mindmindedness in mothers, which possibly reflects a hyperactivating strategy and enhanced vigilance for attachment-and affective-related information (Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002), particularly at the generally low levels of attachment anxiety reported by the mothers in this sample.…”
Section: Maternal Mind-mindedness Buffered the Ongoing Effects Of A Nmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations