The records of all testicular cancer patients evaluated and treated at our medical center during two consecutive 9-year periods were reviewed and analyzed for prognostic factors, particularly the impact of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. The data base of 244 patients was divided into two eras: 1970-1978, defined as the "pre-cisplatin era" (n = 101) and 1979-1987, the "cisplatin era" (n = 143). Statistically improved survival (P = 0.024) was noted for the 165 nonseminoma patients and for a grouping of 143 patients treated with combination chemotherapy (P = 0.004) during the cisplatin era. Stratification by stage revealed that stage II patients had the most significant survival advantage (P = 0.001) during the cisplatin era; cancer mortality improved from 48°7o to 9°70. Cancer death rates for stage III patients decreased from 58% to 39°7o which is clinically but not statistically significant (P = 0.497). Stage I patients and the seminoma population did well during both eras, and the impact of cisplatin could not be statistically confirmed in this study for these subgroups. Multivariate statistical analysis confirmed the importance of the era of treatment for the nonseminoma population.The improved outlook for testicular cancer patients has been widely touted in the urologic and oncologic literature [1, 2, 4-6, 10, 11, 13, 14, 18-25]. There is no question that tremendous progress has been made with patients treated under protocol settings and by experts in the field at centers that treat a high volume of such patients. We sought to address the question as to whether this improved outlook could be expected in all patients treated by a variety of physicians and not necessarily under protocol conditions. We therefore reviewed our entire experience with all testicular cancer patients seen over an 18-year period; we not only analyzed the composite pop-