1989
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891015)64:8<1608::aid-cncr2820640809>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testicular seminoma. Results of the Yale University experience, 1964–1984

Abstract: Eighty-three testicular seminoma patients were treated with radiation therapy from 1964 through 1984. Seventy-nine (95%) of the 83 patients had early disease that included 61 Stage I, 15 Stage IIA (pelvic or paraaortic lymph node involvement less than or equal to 5 cm), and 3 Stage IIB (pelvic or paraaortic lymph node involvement greater than 5 cm) patients. The 15-year actuarial survival for this group of Stage I and II patients was 95% (+/- 5%). Stage I patients were treated with a mean paraaortic/pelvic dos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the patterns-of-care review, the 10-year survival for seminoma was 91.7%, whereas that for nonseminoma ranged from 60% to 74% [16]. In a recent review of the Yale University experience with seminoma between 1964 and 1984, the 15-year actuarial survival for stage I and II patients was 95% (_+5%) [13]. The 8% cancer mortality obtained in the present study for seminoma patients was equivalent to these reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In the patterns-of-care review, the 10-year survival for seminoma was 91.7%, whereas that for nonseminoma ranged from 60% to 74% [16]. In a recent review of the Yale University experience with seminoma between 1964 and 1984, the 15-year actuarial survival for stage I and II patients was 95% (_+5%) [13]. The 8% cancer mortality obtained in the present study for seminoma patients was equivalent to these reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This was the standard method until the beginning of the 1980's. Since the 1990's, following the low pelvic relapse rates reported in stage I tumors (less than 5%), the indication for pelvic irradiation was challenged [10,35,36]. The results of this new approach were excellent with a low pelvic relapse rate [37-39].…”
Section: Stage I Seminomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that a clinical target volume (CTV) on the right side, comprising the paracaval, precaval and inter aortocaval nodes is justified. The left side should comprise, additionally, the latero-aortic, pre-aortic and left renal hilar nodes [6,7,10,35]. The inguinal orchiectomy scar and ipsilateral scrotal contents are not treated unless scrotal violation has occurred during surgery.…”
Section: Stage I Seminomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, radiation-induced injury remains a major concern, as it may lead to urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, radiation enteritis and lymphedema of the lower extremities (5,8). Scrotal edema is a rare side effect of radiotherapy in men with pelvic cancer; Hunter and Peschel were the first to report persistent unilateral scrotal edema as a minor treatment-related complication of radiotherapy in 1989 (9). To date, only few studies have reported the development of scrotal edema in patients who received pelvic radiation; however, they offered no further details on the cases (10-13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%