2000
DOI: 10.2514/2.1138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Time Increase by Delaying Driver Gas Contamination for Reflected Shock Tunnels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…-Driver-gas composition. Experiments performed using one of the driver-gas-contamination detectors mentioned above have shown that the onset of driver-gas contamination may be delayed by causing the condition to be slightly under-tailored [18]. This was achieved in our experiments by increasing the proportion of helium to argon in the compression tube to 80%/20%, while keeping the pressure of the mixture constant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-Driver-gas composition. Experiments performed using one of the driver-gas-contamination detectors mentioned above have shown that the onset of driver-gas contamination may be delayed by causing the condition to be slightly under-tailored [18]. This was achieved in our experiments by increasing the proportion of helium to argon in the compression tube to 80%/20%, while keeping the pressure of the mixture constant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The arrival of driver gas is more difficult to determine because it is not usually accompanied by large changes in static pressure, pitot pressure or heat flux. Several techniques have been developed to determine the time of arrival of the driver gas, the most successful and commonly adopted of which use the change in shock angle on a wedge caused by the different ratio of specific heats for the diatomic test gas and the monatomic driver gas [18,14]. These techniques work well in large facilities, but are more difficult to implement and less precise in a small nozzle such as that of T2, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Flow Facility and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 The degree of offtailoring has a large effect on the arrival time t dgc of driver gas at medium and high enthalpy ͑but not low enthalpy͒, with t dgc advanced by overtailoring and delayed by undertailoring. 60,61 Condition C4 was consistently overtailored and expected to suffer significant contamination by time t las . Condition C2, only marginally contaminated for a tailored interface, was consistently undertailored and thus expected to suffer contamination of no more than a few percent until several hundred microseconds after t las .…”
Section: Test Time Disturbances and Unsteadinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempting to extend the duration of the test flow through the addition of an annular gas-bleed arrangement in the shock tube (as has been done previously, for example by Sudani et al (2000)) is unlikely to be successful at these conditions because the contaminating structures appear to be convected into the nozzle along the tube centreline. A particle trap arrangement on the shock tube centreline was investigated by Chue and Eitelberg (1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vortex is seen to separate from the head of the driver gas structure near the shock tube centreline (frames 5600 and 5800 µs), and the contaminating driver gas accelerates along the centreline of the shock tube and into the nozzle throat (frames 6000 and 6200 µs). This mechanism causes the driver gas to arrive in the test flow prematurely here and is possibly the mechanism that causes driver gas to arrive prematurely in the test flow for over-tailored conditions in other facilities (Sudani et al, 2000).…”
Section: Over-tailored Mode Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%