2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.1289553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation length in high-enthalpy shock/boundary-layer interaction

Abstract: Experiments were performed in the T5 Hypervelocity Shock Tunnel to investigate nonequilibrium real-gas effects on separation length using a double-wedge geometry and nitrogen test gas. Local external flow conditions were estimated by computing the inviscid nonequilibrium flow field. A new scaling parameter was developed to approximately account for wall temperature effects on separation length for a laminar nonreacting boundary layer and arbitrary viscosity law. A classification was introduced to divide mechan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(124 reference statements)
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of similarity laws are reported in the literature, which relates separation length to the freestream conditions and other parameters such as incipient separation pressure/ plateau pressure and reattachment pressure. These include compression ramp/double wedge cases at supersonic [7] as well as hypersonic freestreams [3,8], supersonic impinging shock cases [9,10]; the separation length for a hypersonic double cone [11] was also found to follow a correlation similar to that proposed by Davis and Sturtevant [3] for double wedges. Recently, John and Kulkarni [12] analyzed the important correlations reported in the literature, by comparing their numerical data for compression corner for Mach numbers ranging from 5 to 11.63 (the correlation [10] for impinging shock case was also compared by suitably adapting the parameters); it was noted that the correlations were not universal.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A number of similarity laws are reported in the literature, which relates separation length to the freestream conditions and other parameters such as incipient separation pressure/ plateau pressure and reattachment pressure. These include compression ramp/double wedge cases at supersonic [7] as well as hypersonic freestreams [3,8], supersonic impinging shock cases [9,10]; the separation length for a hypersonic double cone [11] was also found to follow a correlation similar to that proposed by Davis and Sturtevant [3] for double wedges. Recently, John and Kulkarni [12] analyzed the important correlations reported in the literature, by comparing their numerical data for compression corner for Mach numbers ranging from 5 to 11.63 (the correlation [10] for impinging shock case was also compared by suitably adapting the parameters); it was noted that the correlations were not universal.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, the inverse cubic relationship with Mach number suggested by Katzer [10] holds for the present experiments too. Other scaling laws for separation length reported in the literature, for different flow regimes (from supersonic to hypersonic, including real gas effects) and different Reynolds number ranges, have also shown inverse cubic variation with Mach number [3,7,8]. However, for larger Reynolds numbers, the similarity law for supersonic separation bubble, proposed by Burggraf [7] based on asymptotic theory, showed non-linear dependence on pressure.…”
Section: Correlation For Separation Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This type of thermocouple gauge is used extensively in the T5 reflected shock tunnel at GALCIT. [16][17][18] The high enthalpy test conditions result in adequate signal levels and the robust design of the gages make them highly resistant to damage caused by particulates in the test gas as well as the large heat fluxes. 16 The output signal is processed by a differential amplifier circuit mounted exterior to the test section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%