2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(200011)28:3<311::aid-eat8>3.0.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability of the eating disorder examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
158
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
158
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because binge eating frequency was skewed, a dichotomous variable was formed, wherein participants who reported two or more DSM-IV defined binge eating episodes in the past 3 months were coded 1, and all others were coded 0. The EDE has been found to have acceptable internal consistency (␣ ϭ .76 -.90), test-retest reliability (r ϭ .83-.97), interrater reliability ( ϭ .70 -.99), and to discriminate between individuals with eating disorders and controls (Rizvi, Peterson, Crow, & Agras, 2000;Williamson, Anderson, Jackman, & Jackson, 1995). To assess the interrater reliability in our study, a second clinical assessor who was blind to the first diagnosis reinterviewed a randomly selected subset of participants (5%) within a 3-day period, which resulted in high interrater agreement ( ϭ .88).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because binge eating frequency was skewed, a dichotomous variable was formed, wherein participants who reported two or more DSM-IV defined binge eating episodes in the past 3 months were coded 1, and all others were coded 0. The EDE has been found to have acceptable internal consistency (␣ ϭ .76 -.90), test-retest reliability (r ϭ .83-.97), interrater reliability ( ϭ .70 -.99), and to discriminate between individuals with eating disorders and controls (Rizvi, Peterson, Crow, & Agras, 2000;Williamson, Anderson, Jackman, & Jackson, 1995). To assess the interrater reliability in our study, a second clinical assessor who was blind to the first diagnosis reinterviewed a randomly selected subset of participants (5%) within a 3-day period, which resulted in high interrater agreement ( ϭ .88).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDE is a semi-structured, interviewer-based instrument with established reliability and validity (Z. Cooper, Cooper, & Fairburn, 1989;Grilo, Masheb, Lozano-Blanco, & Barry, 2004;Rizvi, Peterson, Crow, & Agras, 2000;Rosen, Vara, Wendt, & Leitenberg, 1990). EDE items assessing weekly frequency of binge eating episodes (i.e., consumption of an unambiguously large amount of food accompanied by loss of control over eating) and binge eating-related distress over the past six months were used as validators in comparisons of women with BED reporting threshold and subthreshold overvaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDE is considered the best established method for the assessment of the features of eating disorders and is widely used in studies of BED (Grilo, Masheb & Wilson, 2001a;Grilo, Masheb & Wilson, 2001b). Psychometric studies of the EDE have demonstrated adequate internal consistency and good discriminative validity (Cooper, Cooper, & Fairburn, 1989;Rosen et al, 1990) and have reported good inter-rater and test-retest reliability (Grilo, Masheb, Lozano-Blanco, & Barry, 2004;Rizvi, Peterson, Crow & Agras, 2000).…”
Section: Procedures and Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%