2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of overvaluation of shape and weight in binge eating disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(53 reference statements)
6
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We note several strengths and limitations of our study as a context for interpreting these results. In addition to comparing the DSM-5 severity approach with alternative ones (see Goldschmidt et al, 2010;Grilo et al, 2001;Peterson, Miller, Crow, Thuras, & Mitchell, 2005), future research should also examine whether the four DSM-5 defined severity groups of BED differ significantly from each other in additional variables of clinical interest, including putative maintenance factors (i.e. Additionally, a post hoc power analysis (Reid, 2014) revealed that given the observed effect size for the between group differences outlined in the results section and Table 2, an alpha error probability of .05 and a sample size of 189, the estimated power of our analyses was 86.8 to 89.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note several strengths and limitations of our study as a context for interpreting these results. In addition to comparing the DSM-5 severity approach with alternative ones (see Goldschmidt et al, 2010;Grilo et al, 2001;Peterson, Miller, Crow, Thuras, & Mitchell, 2005), future research should also examine whether the four DSM-5 defined severity groups of BED differ significantly from each other in additional variables of clinical interest, including putative maintenance factors (i.e. Additionally, a post hoc power analysis (Reid, 2014) revealed that given the observed effect size for the between group differences outlined in the results section and Table 2, an alpha error probability of .05 and a sample size of 189, the estimated power of our analyses was 86.8 to 89.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In a longitudinal study of 12,814 US adolescents, boys were more likely to underestimate their body weight because they prefer a large and physically developed body. 22 Such misperceptions in girls who overestimate their weight status reflect increasing concerns that this issue might lead to development of eating disorders 31,32 or the use of UWCBs. 19 Although several studies have reported that male adolescents often a preferred muscular and physically developed body, 19,21 Grogan 29 suggested that the meaning of ''masculinity'' in the male body changed in Western societies from a large and heavy body to a slender and moderately muscular body during the late 1980s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, weight and shape concerns are presumed to be more stable over time, similar to core beliefs or personality constructs such as self‐esteem (e.g. Cooper & Fairburn, ; Goldschmidt et al, ). In conclusion, in spite of these aspects to be considered regarding the ambiguity of body dissatisfaction and overvaluation of shape and weight in BED, the existing studies provide hints that weight and shape concerns seem to be an important symptom of BED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%