1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00036-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test\re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: theoretical and practical issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

20
182
7
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
20
182
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The IDED yields a number of different sub-measures, but the total errors score (adjusted for trials completed) represents the best overall index of mental flexibility and thus was used for the current study. The IDED demonstrates good test-retest reliability (r = .70; Lowe & Rabbitt, 1998).…”
Section: Mental Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IDED yields a number of different sub-measures, but the total errors score (adjusted for trials completed) represents the best overall index of mental flexibility and thus was used for the current study. The IDED demonstrates good test-retest reliability (r = .70; Lowe & Rabbitt, 1998).…”
Section: Mental Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuropsychological test batteries have been used for one-off psychological assessments, for evaluating changes over time, and for evaluating the effects of interventions (Lowe & Rabbitt, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research suggests that CANTAB is a suitable method to measure cognitive functions in 4-to 90-year-old individuals, particularly in people with Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and autism (Lowe & Rabbitt, 1998;Luciana, 2003). Studies have also demonstrated that it is sensitive to deficits due to several neuropsychological and psychiatric conditions, especially in the elderly (e.g., Blackwell et al, 2003;Levaux et al, 2007;Robbins et al, 1998;Sahakian & Owen, 1992), but also in children (e.g., Gau & Shang, 2010;Fried, Hirshfeld-Becker, Petty, Batchelder, & Biederman, 2012;Luciana, Lindeke, Georgieff, Mills, & Nelson, 1999;Rhodes, Riby, Matthews, & Coghill, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the SEM, the SDC was calculated for use with mean group results for all neuropsychological outcome measures (see Table 4 [52,57,59,60]; Grooved Pegboard [61,62]; WAIS Digit Span [36,63]. e = All correlation coefficients were significant at P<.001.…”
Section: Test-retest Reliability and Practice Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%