2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-022-01074-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test power properties of within-firm estimators of ownership and board-related explanatory variables with low time variation

Abstract: Corporate governance research is often limited in its ability to employ within-firm estimators, which address time-invariant endogeneity, when the variables of interest exhibit low time variation (for example, ownership and board independence). The problem is further exacerbated if data for multiple points in time needs to be hand-collected. We offer simulation-based methodological guidance to improve the statistical power of within-firm estimators in the presence of low time variation. We illustrate the usefu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires the selection of valid instruments correlated with CEO variables but uncorrelated with environmental performance. Board size and board independence are relatively stable over time and may be much less likely to be impacted by firm performance than other governance variables, which is widely recognised in corporate governance research (e.g., Armstrong et al 2010;Brown et al 2011;Al-Shaer et al 2017;Nuber and Velte, 2021;Boutchkova et al 2022). Therefore, we, follow prior research in our choice of instrumental variables (IVs) (Ben-Amar et al 2017;Nuber and Velte, 2021), selecting the industry average of board size, BODSIZE and board independence, BOD-IND.…”
Section: Addressing Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the selection of valid instruments correlated with CEO variables but uncorrelated with environmental performance. Board size and board independence are relatively stable over time and may be much less likely to be impacted by firm performance than other governance variables, which is widely recognised in corporate governance research (e.g., Armstrong et al 2010;Brown et al 2011;Al-Shaer et al 2017;Nuber and Velte, 2021;Boutchkova et al 2022). Therefore, we, follow prior research in our choice of instrumental variables (IVs) (Ben-Amar et al 2017;Nuber and Velte, 2021), selecting the industry average of board size, BODSIZE and board independence, BOD-IND.…”
Section: Addressing Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%