2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of fit for a Laplace distribution against heavier tailed alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both return processes (the upper and the lower graphs in Figure 3) display the pattern of stationarity, clustered volatilities and mean close to zero. The P values of the Jarque–Bera test (Jarque & Bera, 1980), the Robust Jarque–Bera test (Gel & Gastwirth, 2008) and the SJ test (Gel, Miao, & Gastwirth, 2007) for both log‐returns are all shown to be less than 10 −16 , indicating that the log return processes for Euro/USD and DAX are heavier than normal, which confirms the previous findings of Ullrich (2009) on currency exchange rates and discussion of DAX log‐returns by Küchler et al (1999), Claessen & Mittnik (2002), Haas, Mittnik, & Paolella (2006), and Gel (2010). Hence, the new robust permutation and bootstrap tests might be the preferred procedures.…”
Section: Case Studies On Analysis Of the Euro/us Dollar Exchange Rasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Both return processes (the upper and the lower graphs in Figure 3) display the pattern of stationarity, clustered volatilities and mean close to zero. The P values of the Jarque–Bera test (Jarque & Bera, 1980), the Robust Jarque–Bera test (Gel & Gastwirth, 2008) and the SJ test (Gel, Miao, & Gastwirth, 2007) for both log‐returns are all shown to be less than 10 −16 , indicating that the log return processes for Euro/USD and DAX are heavier than normal, which confirms the previous findings of Ullrich (2009) on currency exchange rates and discussion of DAX log‐returns by Küchler et al (1999), Claessen & Mittnik (2002), Haas, Mittnik, & Paolella (2006), and Gel (2010). Hence, the new robust permutation and bootstrap tests might be the preferred procedures.…”
Section: Case Studies On Analysis Of the Euro/us Dollar Exchange Rasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Such a comparison includes 22 tests available in the literature with 27 possible distributions (symmetric or asymmetric) presented as alternatives to the Laplace distribution. To our best knowledge this study is the first attempt made in the literature to compare so many goodness-of-fit tests for the Laplace distribution and alternative distributions (c.f., Best, Rayner, and Thas (2008) and Gel (2010)). Section 5 presents a summary of the results of the paper and some practical relevant conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yen and Moore 1988;Rublík 1997;Puig and Stephens 2000a;Chen 2002, and references cited therein); (ii) tests based on the empirical characteristic function (c.f. Meintanis 2005); (iii) moment based tests, i.e., tests based on sample moments, skewness and kurtosis (González-Estrada and Villaseñor 2016;Gel 2010;Rayner and Best 1989;Langholz and Kronmal 1991;Li and Papadopoulos 2002); (iv) entropy and divergence based tests (Choi and Kim 2006; (Gulati 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iliopoulos and Balakrishnan [12] developed exact inference for the location and scale parameters of Laplace distribution based on their maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) with a Type-II censored data. Gel [13] proposed a new test of fit for a Laplace distribution based on sample skewness and kurtosis and a robust L1estimator of scale about a sample median. Shi et al [14] studied robust estimation for linear and mixture linear errorsin-variables regression models based on the relationship between the least absolute deviation criterion and MLE in a Laplace distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%