Abstract:The Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test is one of the principal tools to detect ARCH and GARCH effects in financial data analysis. However, when the underlying data are non‐normal, which is often the case in practice, the asymptotic LM test, based on the χ2‐approximation of critical values, is known to perform poorly, particularly for small and moderate sample sizes. In this paper we propose to employ two re‐sampling techniques to find critical values of the LM test, namely permutation and bootstrap. We derive the p… Show more
“…Campbell and Diebold (2005) claim that their preprocessed (deseasonalized and autoregressive filtered) daily mean temperatures exhibit conditional heteroscedasticity. Remarkably, in our case of mean monthly data, both the 2 -approximated and bootstrap-based LM tests also yield highly statistically significant p-values, implying the likely existence of ARCH effects (Engle, 1982;Lee, 1991;Gel and Chen, 2012). Finally, in terms of trend, Campbell and Diebold (2005) assume a linear trend for their model of preprocessed daily surface temperatures, but they do not present any testing results.…”
Section: Water Pollution: the Turkey Lake Watershed Study 1980-2003mentioning
“…Campbell and Diebold (2005) claim that their preprocessed (deseasonalized and autoregressive filtered) daily mean temperatures exhibit conditional heteroscedasticity. Remarkably, in our case of mean monthly data, both the 2 -approximated and bootstrap-based LM tests also yield highly statistically significant p-values, implying the likely existence of ARCH effects (Engle, 1982;Lee, 1991;Gel and Chen, 2012). Finally, in terms of trend, Campbell and Diebold (2005) assume a linear trend for their model of preprocessed daily surface temperatures, but they do not present any testing results.…”
Section: Water Pollution: the Turkey Lake Watershed Study 1980-2003mentioning
“…Even if we assume a GARCH model to be heteroskedastic, the testing procedure is the same as that in by Lee (1991) and Gel and Chen (2012). Therefore, we focus only on the ARCH test.…”
Section: Arch Tests Using Nonparametric Regression Approaches For Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catani and Ahlgren (2017) propose an LM test for ARCH using high-dimentional vector autoregressive models. In addition, Gel and Chen (2012) introduce bootstrap ARCH tests. 3.…”
“…In financial data analysis, the detection of GARCH effects can use the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test (Gel & Chen, 2012). One of the important steps before applying GARCH methodology is to examine the residual of risk and return for evidence of heteroscedasticity.…”
This paper is aimed to explore the co-movement capital market in Southeast Asia and analysis the correlation of conventional and Islamic Index in the regional and global equity. This research become necessary to represent the risk on the capital market and measure market performance, as investor considers the volatility before investing. The time series daily data use from April 2012 to April 2020 both conventional and Islamic stock index in Malaysia and Indonesia. This paper examines the dynamics of conditional volatilities and correlations between those markets by using Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (MGARCH). Our result shows that conventional or composite index in Malaysia less volatile than Islamic, but on the other hand, both drive correlation movement. The other output captures that Islamic Index in Indonesian capital market more gradual volatilities than the Composite Index that tends to be low in risk so that investors intend to keep the shares. Generally, the result shows a correlation in each country for conventional and the Islamic index. However, Internationally Indonesia and Malaysia composite and Islamic is low correlated. Regionally Indonesia's indices movement looks to be more correlated and it's similar to Malaysian Capital Market counterparts. In the global market distress condition, the diversification portfolio between Indonesia and Malaysia does not give many benefits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.