1968
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(68)86943-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Interval Method of Calculating Dairy Herd Improvement Association Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cows in this study with dry periods between 21 With smaller subclass sample sizes, some variation in the magnitude of these differences is, of course, expected but the direction of difference has generally been consistent.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results To Previously Published Researchmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cows in this study with dry periods between 21 With smaller subclass sample sizes, some variation in the magnitude of these differences is, of course, expected but the direction of difference has generally been consistent.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results To Previously Published Researchmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…If short subsequent lactations are unrelated to DD, then they will occur randomly across dry periods and cause no bias in the analyses. Thus, actual milk yield was used in this study and was calculated from test-day yields using the test-interval method [21] and the adjustment factors of Shook et al [23].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testday records in different intervals are treated as different traits (Meyer et al, 1989, Pander et al, 1992, Pander et al, 1993, Swalve, 1995. The method is known as test interval method (TIM) and was described 40 years ago by Everett and Carter (1968) and Sargent et al (1968). This kind of modelling is frequently used in dairy cows (Meyer et al, 1989, Pander et al, 1992, Swalve, 1995, Schaeffer and Jamrozik, 1996, Schaeffer, 1998 and seldom in dairy sheep (Baro et al, 1994, Serrano et al, 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total milk yield was the lactation milk yield calculated from the original test-day records using the test-interval method of Sargent et al (1968).…”
Section: Curve Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%