2013 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/test.2013.6651900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test data analytics — Exploring spatial and test-item correlations in production test data

Abstract: The discovery of patterns and correlations hidden in the test data could help reduce test time and cost. In this paper, we propose a methodology and supporting statistical regression tools that can exploit and utilize both spatial and inter-test-item correlations in the test data for test time and cost reduction. We first describe a statistical regression method, called group lasso, which can identify inter-test-item correlations from test data. After learning such correlations, some test items can be identifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to VP [15]- [20], our proposed BMF framework models the wafer-level spatial variation in frequency domain based on DCT:…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to VP [15]- [20], our proposed BMF framework models the wafer-level spatial variation in frequency domain based on DCT:…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, a number of statistical algorithms and tools, such as virtual probe (VP) [15]- [20] and Gaussian process (GP) [21]- [24], have been developed to model the spatial variation at wafer level. These methods rely on several assumptions that are generally applicable in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In silicon testing, multiple items are tested on the same die or wafer, and the results are correlated strongly between test-items because each item is a function of process parameters often shared. In [4], a subset of test items are measured and results of other test items are predicted using a different algorithm from CS. In other words, the method of [4] is not integrated into the CS framework and moderate intertest-item correlations are not utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], a subset of test items are measured and results of other test items are predicted using a different algorithm from CS. In other words, the method of [4] is not integrated into the CS framework and moderate intertest-item correlations are not utilized. Also, it aims to reduce the test time, not to improve the quality of the prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%