2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2007.377979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tertiary-Tree 12-GHz 32-bit Adder in 65nm Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared our design with three previous high speed 32-bit adders [2,3,4]. We implemented these adders in 65 nm technology with 1.3 V voltage supply and compared them with our proposed adder in Table I.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We compared our design with three previous high speed 32-bit adders [2,3,4]. We implemented these adders in 65 nm technology with 1.3 V voltage supply and compared them with our proposed adder in Table I.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More area occupied by the LVS-CLA adder is due to static and dynamic peripheral circuits with little power dissipation. In comparison to static-dynamic sparse tree structures [3,4], LVS pass-transistor-based Manchester chain logic is more appropriate for very high speed structures while static-dynamic sparse trees can dissipate less power in some implementations. Therefore, for achieving very high speed and low power dissipation LVS-CLA adder is much more appropriate among the latest structures while occupying more area.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have checked with CACTI [17] the access times of a register file and an DL1 cache like the ones found in the LEON4 [5] (1088 bits for the register file, 16KB for the DL1 in 65nm). The difference between both is enough to include a 32 bit adder [2], so this addition would not increase the stage time of the memory stage. Fig.…”
Section: E Laec Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%