2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
431
1
17

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 552 publications
(460 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
10
431
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses a SICK LMS151 LiDAR and records the first and last returns at 905 nm over a 360 • horizontal and 270 • vertical scan in less than 35 s. It has a 0.25 • angular resolution and a 0.86 • beam divergence and a maximum range of 40 m. The CBL was placed on a tripod and oriented with a level so that the resulting x, y point cloud was in the horizontal plane. Four CBL scans were taken from opposing sides of each plot to minimize occlusion [45,46]. For each scan, the CBL was placed 1.6 m from the side of the plot at a height of 1.6 m. This ensured that the CBL was always above the grass (heights 50 to 70 cm) and meant that the grass was between 1.84 m and 2.80 m away from the CBL.…”
Section: Remotely Sensed Data Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a SICK LMS151 LiDAR and records the first and last returns at 905 nm over a 360 • horizontal and 270 • vertical scan in less than 35 s. It has a 0.25 • angular resolution and a 0.86 • beam divergence and a maximum range of 40 m. The CBL was placed on a tripod and oriented with a level so that the resulting x, y point cloud was in the horizontal plane. Four CBL scans were taken from opposing sides of each plot to minimize occlusion [45,46]. For each scan, the CBL was placed 1.6 m from the side of the plot at a height of 1.6 m. This ensured that the CBL was always above the grass (heights 50 to 70 cm) and meant that the grass was between 1.84 m and 2.80 m away from the CBL.…”
Section: Remotely Sensed Data Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to derive meaningful harmonized stand-level metrics of forest stand for such a purpose, Tomppo et al [43] suggested a sample plot of 0.5 hectares would be appropriate. As a result, a terrestrial LiDAR technique [13,[43][44][45][46][47] would be appropriate for collecting accurate ground data that minimize measurement uncertainty for stand-level AGC modeling. Additionally, it may be possible to use low resolution airborne LiDAR data or high-resolution satellite SAR images such as POLSAR [48] and TanDEM-X [49] to obtain parameters of forest canopy as the predictors of stand-level AGC models.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, field measurements are also needed to validate biophysical attributes of the vegetation such as volume, carbon stocks, tree height, etc. However, traditional field sampling methods are limited in their application to tropical mountainous regions, and the accuracy of inventory data is constrained by the quality and quantity of the field samples [8]. Fortunately, remote sensing methods have evolved sufficiently to support forest inventories in large landscapes [9], which allows rapid, automatic, and periodical estimates of many forest inventory attributes [8] and can also help to improve the precision of forest area estimates [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%