2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: Expanding the horizon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 220 publications
0
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laser Scanning (LS) systems integrated on various airborne and terrestrial platforms achieved a great success. A road map of LSbased forest investigation is currently being formulated, which uses the terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and/or Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) to collect plot-level field data (Liang et al 2016;Wallace et al 2017;Saarinen et al 2017;Hyyppä et al 2020b;Calders et al 2020), and to further calibrate airborne laser scanning (ALS) data as well as other aerial and satellite data for regional and national level assimilation (Coomes et al 2017;Urbazaev et al 2018;Dalponte et al 2019). However, barriers still exist for the automated systems to be independent from the conventional field measurements as a supplier of in situ reference information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser Scanning (LS) systems integrated on various airborne and terrestrial platforms achieved a great success. A road map of LSbased forest investigation is currently being formulated, which uses the terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and/or Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) to collect plot-level field data (Liang et al 2016;Wallace et al 2017;Saarinen et al 2017;Hyyppä et al 2020b;Calders et al 2020), and to further calibrate airborne laser scanning (ALS) data as well as other aerial and satellite data for regional and national level assimilation (Coomes et al 2017;Urbazaev et al 2018;Dalponte et al 2019). However, barriers still exist for the automated systems to be independent from the conventional field measurements as a supplier of in situ reference information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted field surveys will be always needed to validate these predictions and community annotation efforts will allow for assessment of this component of uncertainty. In particular, combining terrestrial LiDAR sampling with airborne sensors is a promising route to both validate the number of stems and establish subcanopy diversity ( Calders et al, 2020 ). In addition, when co-registered hyperspectral data are available, it may help to separate neighboring trees in diverse forests, provided it does not cause lumping of neighboring trees of the same species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TLS provides clear benefits over traditional manual field surveys and is increasingly utilised in the research community. However, capital cost has been a major barrier to the wider adoption of this technology, constricting the application of research outcomes by the wider community [34,35]. We show that rapid developments in commercial scanners now enable us to cost-effectively acquire point clouds of sufficient quality for detailed vegetation surveys.…”
Section: Negating the Cost Barriermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A major limiting factor to the adoption of TLS for vegetation surveys is the budgetary implications of purchasing high-quality scanners (>USD 100,000) generally used for geomorphological and ecological surveys [34]. Such scanners generally have small beam divergence, high signal-to-noise ratio and in-built GPS systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%