2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12060996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ternary Blended Binder for Production of a Novel Type of Lightweight Repair Mortar

Abstract: The goal of the paper was development and testing of a novel type of ternary blended binder based on lime hydrate, metakaolin, and biomass ash that was studied as a binding material for production of lightweight mortar for renovation purposes. The biomass ash used as one of binder components was coming from wood chips ash combustion in a biomass heating plant. The raw ash was mechanically activated by grinding. In mortar composition, wood chips ash and metakaolin were used as partial substitutes of lime hydrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitatively similar moisture absorption observed, e.g., Pavlíková et al 2019 [87] who obtained lime-based repair mortar A w = 0.32 kg/(m 2 ∙s1 /2 ) [84]. Also, Fusade et al [88] obtained NHL mortars water absorption coefficient in the range 0.30–0.379 kg/(m 2 ∙s1 /2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitatively similar moisture absorption observed, e.g., Pavlíková et al 2019 [87] who obtained lime-based repair mortar A w = 0.32 kg/(m 2 ∙s1 /2 ) [84]. Also, Fusade et al [88] obtained NHL mortars water absorption coefficient in the range 0.30–0.379 kg/(m 2 ∙s1 /2 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The lower porosity of cement-lime mortar and the structure of PC hydrates were the cause of low water absorption. Therefore, PCHL-R and PCHL-LA mortars were found to be not suitable materials for repair of damp masonry, where high water absorption in time is the positive effect, as it would enable the mortar to better absorb moisture from the surrounding masonry and help it dry out as stated by Fucade et al [88].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water vapor permeability was higher for wet cup arrangement of the test than that of assessed in the dry cup analysis. Similar material performance in the different conditions of the cup experiment was observed, e.g., in [ 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The acceleration of water vapor transmission in the wet cup test can be attributed to the reduced surface binding forces between water vapor molecules and pores due to the filling by water molecules within samples conditioning for the test [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The reduced surface bonding of water vapor molecules in the wet-cup experiment resulted in the acceleration of water vapor transmission, and thus lower water vapor resistance factor in comparison with the results of the dry-cup test. Such performance of porous building materials has been documented, e.g., in [70][71][72].…”
Section: Materials ρ B (Kg•mmentioning
confidence: 95%