2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12213557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortars with Crushed Lava Granulate for Repair of Damp Historical Buildings

Abstract: In this paper, crushed lava granulate was used as full silica sand replacement in composition of repair mortars based on hydrated lime, natural hydraulic lime, or cement-lime binder. Lava granules were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Particle size distribution of both silica and lava aggregates was assessed using standard sieve analysis. Hygrothermal function of the developed lightweight materials was characterized by the measureme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For all the proposed materials, was also observed a decrease in the capillary water adsorption coefficient. Similar approaches were published by Moropoulou et al [116] (using several pozzolanic additives), Andrejkovičová et al [117] (using palygorskite and metakaolin), Ventolà et al [118] (using commercial phase changing materials), Rosato et al [119] (using commercial cellulose nano-fibrils), Gour et al [120] (using natural polymers) or Pavlík et al [121] (using crushed lava granulates). However, regarding the reconstruction/consolidation mortars, the best approach, in our opinion, is the one presented by Stefanidou et al [122], respectively designing the mortars according to the nature of the natural stone (in the cases presented by the authors marl limestone, nummulitic limestone, marble, biogenic calcitic sandstones), and as, often as possible, reclaiming local materials.…”
Section: Consolidation and Protection Agentssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For all the proposed materials, was also observed a decrease in the capillary water adsorption coefficient. Similar approaches were published by Moropoulou et al [116] (using several pozzolanic additives), Andrejkovičová et al [117] (using palygorskite and metakaolin), Ventolà et al [118] (using commercial phase changing materials), Rosato et al [119] (using commercial cellulose nano-fibrils), Gour et al [120] (using natural polymers) or Pavlík et al [121] (using crushed lava granulates). However, regarding the reconstruction/consolidation mortars, the best approach, in our opinion, is the one presented by Stefanidou et al [122], respectively designing the mortars according to the nature of the natural stone (in the cases presented by the authors marl limestone, nummulitic limestone, marble, biogenic calcitic sandstones), and as, often as possible, reclaiming local materials.…”
Section: Consolidation and Protection Agentssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The combined expanded uncertainty of this measurement was 1.2%. From the bulk density and specific density data, the porosity ψ was calculated as introduced, e.g., in Reference [28]. The expanded combined uncertainty of the total open porosity test was 1.8%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the subject of the additional thermal insulation of historical masonry walls from the inside aspects of this issue, presented in [26][27][28][29][30][31] have been taken into account. The problem of internal thermal insulation using a capillary active mineral plate or block systems is barely described in the literature, especially when it comes to the protection of external surfaces against moisture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%