2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-9322(02)00032-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminal velocity of single bubbles in surface tension force dominant regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

32
281
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
32
281
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of our objectives is to standardize the initial conditions, a luxury not easily available to experimenters! A curious phenomenon, the path instability, has been the subject of a host of experimental [22][23][24][25] , numerical 26,27 and analytical 28,29 studies. This is the name given to the tendency of the bubble, under certain conditions, to adopt a spiral or zigzagging path rather than a straight one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of our objectives is to standardize the initial conditions, a luxury not easily available to experimenters! A curious phenomenon, the path instability, has been the subject of a host of experimental [22][23][24][25] , numerical 26,27 and analytical 28,29 studies. This is the name given to the tendency of the bubble, under certain conditions, to adopt a spiral or zigzagging path rather than a straight one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will demonstrate that path and shape symmetry are intimately connected, but only the former has been measured experimentally. It is not easy to measure the evolving bubble shape 24 and flow field accurately in this highly 3D regime. Most of the workers embarking on this study find it satisfactory to investigate the effect of initial bubble diameter on the rising dynamics, and no experimental investigations are available to our knowledge which study the effects of just the surface tension or viscosity of water on the bubble rise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement is better for K4, which does not show the water velocity peak 1052 near the wall (Figure 12g Lastly, different drag models were also evaluated. Introducing the effect of bubble aspect 1159 ratio in the drag correlation, as in the model of Tomiyama et al (2002a), allowed the more 1160 accurate calculation of velocity profiles near the wall. In this work, the aspect ratio was 1161 evaluated through the correlation of Welleck et al (1966).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider bubbles in the range of equivalent radius r b = (0.7-1.1) mm corresponding to the flow regime where surface tension forces have dominant influence as described by Tomiyama [50]. Smaller bubbles (r b < 0.91) have a stable rectilinear path while larger bubbles have unstable zig-zag and/or helicoidal path [51,52].…”
Section: Free Rising Air Bubble In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%