2022
DOI: 10.1080/13556509.2023.2182168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Term and concept variation in climate change communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to some of the weaker points identified in the vignettes above, we felt the book contained deficit‐minded (e.g., “students need to understand how and why,” p. 46) and alarmist language (e.g., “purgatorial conditions,” p. 69). While alarmist discourse is sometimes intentionally used to persuade and incite action (Cabezas‐García & León‐Araúz, 2022), a group of respected scientists on the topic (i.e., IPCC) intentionally avoid such language to limit entanglement of science and politics (Medimorec & Pennycook, 2015). Windschitl never discusses this point nor is careful with his own language; thus we hope such discourse is not carried into classrooms by its readers.…”
Section: Who Is the Audience?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to some of the weaker points identified in the vignettes above, we felt the book contained deficit‐minded (e.g., “students need to understand how and why,” p. 46) and alarmist language (e.g., “purgatorial conditions,” p. 69). While alarmist discourse is sometimes intentionally used to persuade and incite action (Cabezas‐García & León‐Araúz, 2022), a group of respected scientists on the topic (i.e., IPCC) intentionally avoid such language to limit entanglement of science and politics (Medimorec & Pennycook, 2015). Windschitl never discusses this point nor is careful with his own language; thus we hope such discourse is not carried into classrooms by its readers.…”
Section: Who Is the Audience?mentioning
confidence: 99%