2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10762-019-00581-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terahertz Diffractive Optics—Smart Control over Radiation

Abstract: Over the last 20 years, thin and lightweight optical elements have become very desirable, especially for the terahertz (THz) range. Reduction of the volume of optical elements alongside an increase in their effective efficiency has begun a new direction of research leading to many practical applications. On top of that, diffractive optical elements can not only focus the incident beam, but also can shape the incoming wavefront into a desirable distribution or can redirect the energy. Starting from theoretical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental implementation of the UNM used here with a focal point at an axial distance z = f relies on 3D-DLW, requiring discretization of a hyperbolic phase ( n : refractive index of the medium, λ 0 : vacuum wavelength, r : radial coordinate). The phase profile ϕ is discretized in steps of 2 π into Fresnel zones via ϕ kin = mod( ϕ ,2 π ), leading to a kinoform-type phase distribution 23 25 (details in Supplementary Results 1 ). Note that the hyperbolic phase profile exhibits less critical curvature towards the edges than its parabolic counterpart, and is, thus, used throughout this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental implementation of the UNM used here with a focal point at an axial distance z = f relies on 3D-DLW, requiring discretization of a hyperbolic phase ( n : refractive index of the medium, λ 0 : vacuum wavelength, r : radial coordinate). The phase profile ϕ is discretized in steps of 2 π into Fresnel zones via ϕ kin = mod( ϕ ,2 π ), leading to a kinoform-type phase distribution 23 25 (details in Supplementary Results 1 ). Note that the hyperbolic phase profile exhibits less critical curvature towards the edges than its parabolic counterpart, and is, thus, used throughout this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other metrics like EDOF, FOV magnification, aberrations can also be included; but these are often not the principal criterion that one looks at when designing an optical element. The choice of performing this study on MDLs primarily operating the THz regime is due to two main reasons [42][43][44][45] . First, the ease in modelling larger unit cells ("rings") leads to the total number of elements in the entire structure to be small and tractable; hence, it is easy to capture the trade-off in efficiency with faster simulations and develop accurate prediction metrics.…”
Section: Sourangsu Banerji Jacqueline Cooke and Berardi Sensale-rodrigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the desired phase distribution is coded in the form of the required transmittance of DOE— [ 57 ]. Of course does not have to be binarized, it could be coded into transmittance with different shapes, such as sine-like, step-like or saw-blade (blazed, corresponding to kinoform) [ 21 , 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Classic Doe Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for example, binary amplitude coding will have the maximal equal to 10.1% which is the of the amplitude binary diffraction grating. All maximal values for each coding type are given in Table 1 and in [ 21 , 30 , 60 , 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Classic Doe Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation