2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tephra studies and the reconstruction of Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic cultural trajectories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 and references therein, Proto-Aurignacian levels according to ref. 49) reveal that the final stages of this techno-culture approach the 14 C age of either CI eruption or of the cultural levels from the CI-sites sealed by the tephra (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…48 and references therein, Proto-Aurignacian levels according to ref. 49) reveal that the final stages of this techno-culture approach the 14 C age of either CI eruption or of the cultural levels from the CI-sites sealed by the tephra (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…48 and references therein, Proto-Aurignacian levels according to ref. 49). The temporal extent of the Heinrich Event 4 (HE4), in both radiocarbon and calendar time-scales, is also shown.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors argue that the emergence of key cultural innovations in our lineage, including complex bone technology, is not the direct consequence of the emergence of anatomically modern humans in Africa. The emergence, disappearance, and reemergence of behavioural innovations among both African and Eurasian populations should instead be attributed to demographic and social events, triggered partially by climatic factors (Backwell et al, 2008;d'Errico and Banks, 2013;d'Errico and Stringer, 2011;Hovers and Belfer-Cohen, 2006;Powell et al, 2009). For these authors, the evolution of human societies in the last 300 ka has followed many paths, not necessarily progressive or incremental in nature, in which the material expression of modern cognition is represented by different mosaics of cultural innovation, which need to be understood and traced at a regional scale.…”
Section: Asian Bone Tools and The "Behavioural Modernity' Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of formal bone tool production in Africa come mostly from coastal or near-coastal South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sites, including Blombos Cave, (d' Errico and Henshilwood, 2007;Henshilwood et al, 2001), Klasies River (d' Errico and Henshilwood, 2007), Sibudu Cave (Backwell et al, 2008;d'Errico et al, 2012a), and Border Cave (Backwell et al, 2008;d'Errico et al, 2012a). A point tip, a mesial fragment, an almost complete spear point, a tanged bone point and 26 awls are reported from M1 and M2 layers at Blombos Cave, with ages of~84e72 ka (Henshilwood et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors contributing to the difficulty in testing the foregoing hypotheses include persistent uncertainties in the chronology of archaeological sites at the so called Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in Europe (23)(24)(25) and in the taxonomic affiliation of their inhabitants during this period (26)(27)(28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%