2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1061933x19030074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensiometric and Rheological Properties of Functionalized Imidazolium Surfactants at a Liquid–Gas Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 74 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shift in the maximum toward lower mole ratios of intensity (Figure a) and WL (Figure b) suggests a delay in the onset of NP–NP interactions by increasing hydrophobicity (from C12 to C16), which also significantly increases the size (up to ∼2000 nm) of the NP–NP complex, which is even much greater than that produced by 16-2-16 (∼700 nm) previously observed in Figure c. This indicates that the induction of the imidazolium head group is also responsible for the reduction of electrostatic interactions due to the presence of aromaticity in the head group region in comparison to the tetraalkylammonium head group of 16-2-16, which in turn promotes the hydrophobic interactions. This is evident from an increase in the size with the increase in the hydrocarbon chain length, which clearly indicates the participation of the hydrophobic interactions in NP–NP complexation. Thus, the increase in the size of the NP–NP complex happens only when the length of the hydrocarbon tail of the gemini surfactant is increased, which is in contrast to the increase in the spacer length that actually decreases the size and produces smaller stable colloidal aggregates (Figure c).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The shift in the maximum toward lower mole ratios of intensity (Figure a) and WL (Figure b) suggests a delay in the onset of NP–NP interactions by increasing hydrophobicity (from C12 to C16), which also significantly increases the size (up to ∼2000 nm) of the NP–NP complex, which is even much greater than that produced by 16-2-16 (∼700 nm) previously observed in Figure c. This indicates that the induction of the imidazolium head group is also responsible for the reduction of electrostatic interactions due to the presence of aromaticity in the head group region in comparison to the tetraalkylammonium head group of 16-2-16, which in turn promotes the hydrophobic interactions. This is evident from an increase in the size with the increase in the hydrocarbon chain length, which clearly indicates the participation of the hydrophobic interactions in NP–NP complexation. Thus, the increase in the size of the NP–NP complex happens only when the length of the hydrocarbon tail of the gemini surfactant is increased, which is in contrast to the increase in the spacer length that actually decreases the size and produces smaller stable colloidal aggregates (Figure c).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%