2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tense and Agreement dissociations in German agrammatic speakers: Underspecification vs. hierarchy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
72
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This high accuracy of verb morphology in locally constrained contexts is consistent with previous cross-linguistic research on access to well-formedness constraints of verb morphology (Bastiaanse & van Zonneveld, 1998;De Blesser et al, 1996;Kolk & Heeschen, 1992;Lonzi & Luzzatti, 1993) and will be described in the General discussion. The findings of this Experiment are inconsistent with most syntactic accounts which propose that a deficit of the tense node in the syntactic tree representation impairs all syntactic computations of tense (Arabatzi & Edwards, 2002;Burchert et al, 2005;Friedmann & Grodzinsky, 1997;Wenzlaff & Clahsen, 2004). The next step in investigating the psycholinguistic underpinnings of verb inflection deficits in agrammatism is to examine DER and morphological complexity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This high accuracy of verb morphology in locally constrained contexts is consistent with previous cross-linguistic research on access to well-formedness constraints of verb morphology (Bastiaanse & van Zonneveld, 1998;De Blesser et al, 1996;Kolk & Heeschen, 1992;Lonzi & Luzzatti, 1993) and will be described in the General discussion. The findings of this Experiment are inconsistent with most syntactic accounts which propose that a deficit of the tense node in the syntactic tree representation impairs all syntactic computations of tense (Arabatzi & Edwards, 2002;Burchert et al, 2005;Friedmann & Grodzinsky, 1997;Wenzlaff & Clahsen, 2004). The next step in investigating the psycholinguistic underpinnings of verb inflection deficits in agrammatism is to examine DER and morphological complexity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…mood, or case, tense morphology is known to be especially vulnerable to disruption in agrammatic aphasia in several languages (in English: Arabatzi & Edwards, 2000;and Nadeau & Rothi, 1992;in Spanish: Benedet, Christiansen, & Goodglass, 1998;in Hebrew: Friedmann & Grodzinsky, 1997;in Dutch: Kolk, 2000;in German: Wenzlaff & Clahsen, 2004;in Italian: De Blesser, Bayer, & Luzzatti, 1996;in Greek: Stavrakaki & Kouvava, 2003; but see Burchert, Swoboda-Moll, & De Bleser, 2005, for contrary data). The typical cross-linguistic pattern is substitution of verb forms, such as, *The dentist fix my teeth (target: fixed or will fix), and *The maid washing the window (target: washed or is/was washing).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, verb deficit is among the main defining features of this type of aphasia: only a small number of verbs is typically found in spontaneous speech of these patients regardless of language. They typically omit auxiliaries (such as is, will), and either omit or substitute inflectional affixes (such as -ed in walked) (Miceli, Silveri, Villa & Caramazza, 1984;Menn & Obler, 1990;Hagiwara, 1995, Friedmann & Grodzinsky, 1997Bastiaanse & Thompson, 2003;Burchert et al, 2005;Druks & Carroll, 2005;Diouny, 2007;Bastiaanse, 2008). It has been claimed that paragrammatic speakers, on the other hand, exhibit the opposite pattern, performing better on tasks involving verbs than those with nouns, and making semantic errors and circumlocutions in production of critical forms (Druks, 2002).…”
Section: Becoming a Structure: Patterns Of Aphasic Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selfpaced reading task uses negative imperatives as stimulus sentences. Imperatives have an advantage over finite clauses against the background of converging on-and offline experimental findings which locate the source of agrammatic behaviour at the structural and notional representation of tense (Burchert et al 2005a;Faroqi-Shah and Dickey 2009;Yarbay Duman and Bastiaanse 2009;Wenzlaff and Clahsen 2004), and strengthen the notion that tense disturbances do not necessarily prune the syntactic structure (Burchert et al 2008;Dickey et al 2008;Stavrakaki and Kouvava 2003). Additionally, the experiment seeks to contribute to the discussion revolving around differences in the comprehension of personal and reflexive pronouns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%