2017
DOI: 10.5902/1980509826465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TENDÊNCIAS DE CRESCIMENTO EM ALTURA DOMINANTE DE DOIS CLONES DE <i>Eucalyptus saligna</i> Smith IMPLANTADOS EM DISTINTAS CONDIÇÕES DE SOLO

Abstract: RESUMOUma mesma espécie florestal pode, em distintas condições ambientais, apresentar variações na forma de seu crescimento e em consequência na sua produção final. A altura dominante (h 100 ) é uma das variáveis mais importantes para a prognose da produção florestal, visto que praticamente todas as demais relações funcionais de produção se baseiam na descrição do crescimento desta variável através das funções de índice de sítio. Este trabalho objetivou detectar as possíveis diferenças no crescimento em altura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superiority of the algebraic difference method was confirmed from the graphic analysis of the normalized residuals, which presented a more homogeneous distribution compared to the guide curve method (Figure 2). A similar characteristic was found by Pissinin and Schneider (2017) when they adjusted different models in the guide curve and algebraic difference methods in eucalyptus stands, in which the algebraic difference method presented a homogeneous distribution of residuals and smaller errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superiority of the algebraic difference method was confirmed from the graphic analysis of the normalized residuals, which presented a more homogeneous distribution compared to the guide curve method (Figure 2). A similar characteristic was found by Pissinin and Schneider (2017) when they adjusted different models in the guide curve and algebraic difference methods in eucalyptus stands, in which the algebraic difference method presented a homogeneous distribution of residuals and smaller errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The superiority of the algebraic difference method in the construction of site index curves was also observed by Castro et al (2015), in a eucalyptus stand in Minas Gerais, with the standard error values of the estimate close to 6%. Pissinin and Schneider (2017) observed that the algebraic difference method presented the smallest estimation errors compared to the guide curve, using the Chapman and Richards model. Kitikidou et al (2011), applying the algebraic difference method to construct site index curves in a Pinus brutia stand, observed that the Bailey and Clutter model was superior to Chapman and Richards, corroborating the results obtained in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to Pelissari et al (2013), who worked with seminal stands in the same area, the plots adjacent to the experimental area were classified by the dominant height at all sites of medium to low productivity. Thus, the height trait was likely the most affected, due to the fact that the dominant height was the main indicator of site quality (Pissinin and Schneider 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verificam-se restrições hídricas e má distribuição das chuvas na região do plantio. Geralmente ocorre um período de estiagem variando de quatro a sete meses, e o maior volume de chuvas concentram-se entre os meses de outubro a abril, o que pode afetar o crescimento, uma vez que o mogno africano é considerado uma espécie que depende diretamente de fatores como radiação solar, água e nutrientes (PINHEIRO et al, 2011).…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified